<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Anonymong &#187; anonymity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anonymong.org/category/anonymity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anonymong.org</link>
	<description>Blind in one ear and deaf in one eye</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:52:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sneaky, sneaky very sneaky!</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2012/01/12/sneaky-sneaky-very-sneaky-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2012/01/12/sneaky-sneaky-very-sneaky-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consultation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summer of rage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=2165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2012/01/12/sneaky-sneaky-very-sneaky-2/"></g:plusone></div>
Once again a significant &#8220;consultation&#8221; that no body new about. It would seem that to they&#8217;d like to give the police yet more power: &#8220;This three-part consultation seeks your views on the areas of police powers which the government is committed to reviewing: &#8211; the relevance of the word ‘insulting‘ in section 5 of the <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2012/01/12/sneaky-sneaky-very-sneaky-2/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2012/01/12/sneaky-sneaky-very-sneaky-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best walk so far</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2011/11/07/best-walk-so-far/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2011/11/07/best-walk-so-far/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 20:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conformity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guy Fawkes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=2018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2011/11/07/best-walk-so-far/"></g:plusone></div>
Another November the 5th gone and another &#8220;quiet&#8221; walk around London with the indomitable Old Holborn, Olly Cromwell, Katabasis and others whose presence has been erased by alcohol (remind me if you want) &#8211; which was an utter blast. As has become our want we met in the pleasing environs of Chandos to exchange niceties, <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2011/11/07/best-walk-so-far/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2011/11/07/best-walk-so-far/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Considering Wikileaks</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/12/06/considering-wikileaks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/12/06/considering-wikileaks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sparticus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tin foil hat time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=1320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/12/06/considering-wikileaks/"></g:plusone></div>
Wikileaks has today released what is reportedly a fairly obvious list of facilities that the US considers to be of strategic importance. Which to me raises the question of what purpose the leak serves. Wikileaks presents itself as serving public interest, but what public interest is there in releasing the sort of list that anyone <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/12/06/considering-wikileaks/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/12/06/considering-wikileaks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You&#8217;ll never walk alone</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/11/06/youll-never-walk-alone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/11/06/youll-never-walk-alone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 20:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guy Fawkes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traitors Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=1212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/11/06/youll-never-walk-alone/"></g:plusone></div>
So yesterday being the 5th of November, or if you prefer Traitors day, I toddled down to a certain central London public house along with two friends who&#8217;d come down from up north to join like minded people to go for a little walk as I&#8217;d done on previous years. So having seated ourselves with <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/11/06/youll-never-walk-alone/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/11/06/youll-never-walk-alone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reducing clothing choices in france</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/09/15/reducing-clothing-choices-in-france/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/09/15/reducing-clothing-choices-in-france/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=1133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/09/15/reducing-clothing-choices-in-france/"></g:plusone></div>
According to news reports today the French have either banned the Burqa, niqab or veils. Unfortunately I haven&#8217;t been able to find text of the actual bill to find out what has actually been banned as it makes quite a difference, mind as I don&#8217;t speak or read French it probably wouldn&#8217;t help if I <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/09/15/reducing-clothing-choices-in-france/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/09/15/reducing-clothing-choices-in-france/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Escaping the internet panopticon</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/22/escaping-the-internet-panopticon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/22/escaping-the-internet-panopticon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 23:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tin foil hat time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/22/escaping-the-internet-panopticon/"></g:plusone></div>
I&#8217;ll be returning to looking at the whole take back parliament thing later, but I&#8217;m still digging there so meantime I thought I&#8217;d pull together a few bits on something that I&#8217;m more familiar with. The Devils Kitchen has a link to an excellent article on the Panopticon Parliament which coming so close on the <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/22/escaping-the-internet-panopticon/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/22/escaping-the-internet-panopticon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Erasing David &#8211; someone should</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/04/erasing-david-someone-should/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/04/erasing-david-someone-should/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 23:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/04/erasing-david-someone-should/"></g:plusone></div>
If you&#8217;ve not seen the film &#8220;Erasing David&#8221; and intend to watch it and don&#8217;t want it spoilt then please stop reading now, as I&#8217;ve just finished watching it and really the man problem couldn&#8217;t erase an etcha-sketch without assistance &#8211; so I feel the need to rant and highlight a &#8220;few&#8221; of the mistakes <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/04/erasing-david-someone-should/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/04/erasing-david-someone-should/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Viewscreens are coming</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/29/viewscreens-are-coming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/29/viewscreens-are-coming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tin foil hat time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/29/viewscreens-are-coming/"></g:plusone></div>
This post is going to link to quite a few old articles as every time I&#8217;m about to write it something new adds to the pile of stuff that needs to be included. So it&#8217;s time I accepted the pace of things happening is just too fast and I should try to tie a few <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/29/viewscreens-are-coming/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/29/viewscreens-are-coming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Details of a little walk</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/10/19/details-of-a-little-walk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/10/19/details-of-a-little-walk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guy Fawkes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2009/10/19/details-of-a-little-walk/"></g:plusone></div>
It&#8217;s that time of year again when it seems like a terribly nice idea to go for a gentle stroll through the heart of the fair city of London, in the good company of a group of like minded people in the traditional walking gear of a mask and cloak. Note that unlike the &#8220;procession&#8221; <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2009/10/19/details-of-a-little-walk/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/10/19/details-of-a-little-walk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News for photographers</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/09/21/news-for-photographers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/09/21/news-for-photographers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2009/09/21/news-for-photographers/"></g:plusone></div>
This just in via FitWatch, the Met have updated their guidelines for stopping and searching terrorists photographers, to clarify that they can only see your photographs if they suspect you of being a terrorist and also that they have no right to delete digital photographs or destroy film. They actually state that twice, with regards <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2009/09/21/news-for-photographers/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/09/21/news-for-photographers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

