<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Anonymong &#187; anonymity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anonymong.org/category/anonymity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anonymong.org</link>
	<description>Blind in one ear and deaf in one eye</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:27:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Escaping the internet panopticon</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/22/escaping-the-internet-panopticon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/22/escaping-the-internet-panopticon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 23:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tin foil hat time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll be returning to looking at the whole take back parliament thing later, but I&#8217;m still digging there so meantime I thought I&#8217;d pull together a few bits on something that I&#8217;m more familiar with. The Devils Kitchen has a link to an excellent article on the Panopticon Parliament which coming so close on the <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/22/escaping-the-internet-panopticon/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/22/escaping-the-internet-panopticon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Erasing David &#8211; someone should</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/04/erasing-david-someone-should/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/04/erasing-david-someone-should/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 23:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;ve not seen the film &#8220;Erasing David&#8221; and intend to watch it and don&#8217;t want it spoilt then please stop reading now, as I&#8217;ve just finished watching it and really the man problem couldn&#8217;t erase an etcha-sketch without assistance &#8211; so I feel the need to rant and highlight a &#8220;few&#8221; of the mistakes <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/04/erasing-david-someone-should/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/04/erasing-david-someone-should/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Viewscreens are coming</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/29/viewscreens-are-coming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/29/viewscreens-are-coming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tin foil hat time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is going to link to quite a few old articles as every time I&#8217;m about to write it something new adds to the pile of stuff that needs to be included. So it&#8217;s time I accepted the pace of things happening is just too fast and I should try to tie a few <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/29/viewscreens-are-coming/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/29/viewscreens-are-coming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Details of a little walk</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/10/19/details-of-a-little-walk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/10/19/details-of-a-little-walk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guy Fawkes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s that time of year again when it seems like a terribly nice idea to go for a gentle stroll through the heart of the fair city of London, in the good company of a group of like minded people in the traditional walking gear of a mask and cloak. Note that unlike the &#8220;procession&#8221; <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2009/10/19/details-of-a-little-walk/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/10/19/details-of-a-little-walk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News for photographers</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/09/21/news-for-photographers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/09/21/news-for-photographers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This just in via FitWatch, the Met have updated their guidelines for stopping and searching terrorists photographers, to clarify that they can only see your photographs if they suspect you of being a terrorist and also that they have no right to delete digital photographs or destroy film. They actually state that twice, with regards <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2009/09/21/news-for-photographers/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/09/21/news-for-photographers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perambulation again</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/09/14/perambulation-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/09/14/perambulation-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[band wagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guy Fawkes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the season of mellow fruitfulness descends upon us once again, it returns to mind that this is a delightful time for a genteel stroll amongst the imposing architecture of London. With this in mind it seems that Old Holborn will once more be in town on the 5th November partaking of his with a <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2009/09/14/perambulation-again/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/09/14/perambulation-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Times and NightJack again</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/06/18/the-times-and-nightjack-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/06/18/the-times-and-nightjack-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[band wagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Foster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Off to a folk festival tomorrow and with luck I&#8217;ll not get stabbed again, though if I do the police in Leicester are wonderful as is the hospital ( Which should be more than enough for the voyeur and hacker Parick Foster to fearlessly expose another unimportant blogger). When I return I&#8217;ll update all of <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2009/06/18/the-times-and-nightjack-again/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/06/18/the-times-and-nightjack-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patrick Foster quoting &#8220;sources&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/06/17/patrick-foster-quoting-sources/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/06/17/patrick-foster-quoting-sources/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Foster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As that odious hacker and voyeur Patrick Foster seems to no longer feel that anonymous sources aren&#8217;t a good thing. I&#8217;m sure that with some encouragement he&#8217;ll shortly be clarifying who the sources are in the following stories, purely due to public interest of course: Sources on both sides say &#8230; A source close to <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2009/06/17/patrick-foster-quoting-sources/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/06/17/patrick-foster-quoting-sources/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NightJack update and round up</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/06/17/nightjack-update-and-round-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/06/17/nightjack-update-and-round-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[band wagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Foster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following the Times notable victory over decency yesterday they&#8217;ve graciously allowed NightJack to respond in an article I can&#8217;t help but feel is very reminiscent of a communist show trial where the accused is allowed to publicly confess their sins and misdemeanors. The tactics he describes the Times using are also very reminiscent of those <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2009/06/17/nightjack-update-and-round-up/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/06/17/nightjack-update-and-round-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Talking of anonymous police</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/06/16/talking-of-anonymous-police/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/06/16/talking-of-anonymous-police/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Foster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whilst the value of police bloggers is in mind I&#8217;d like to bring your attention to a &#8220;recent&#8221;* post of Inspector Gadgets. Who in a &#8220;fond&#8221; farewell to Hazel Blears time in the home office chair, links to a quite interesting report on the value of our plastic police, sod all it seems. It seems <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2009/06/16/talking-of-anonymous-police/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/06/16/talking-of-anonymous-police/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
