We need more government Yes once more I’m returning to those crazy kids of the occupy movement, in a week where the LAPD have reportedly been destorying occupy tents* apparently up in Edinburgh the little bit of weather they’ve been having has cleared that camp quite effectively. As the lovely picture from Punk rock Libertarians wonderfully illustrates despite objectionable (and they have objected) tactics from the police the occupy movement seems to continue to call for more government control (of everyone else).

Over her on the more civilised side of the pond our police sent round a badly titled memo warning business people in the city that they’d had reports that some elements of the occupy movement might get up to unpleasant shenanigans and hijinks in the run up to Christmas. No doubt fuelled by copious amounts of non-alchoholic fair trade organic egg-nog. The occupy lot rather took objection to being on the same standard memo as other more nasty people, I’d have thought they’d have been chuffed to be being taken seriously. The warning seems reasonable given the mess that previous related marches and such like have caused.

The London crowd though seem to be made of cannier stuff and have prepared for winter by on the back of the strikes the other week, have “occupied” a variety of unoccupied buildings – something that used to be called squatting when I were an even younger lad. My current favourite of these is the Bloomsbury square squat.

Bloomsbury square squat Renamed by the squatters as the “Bloomsbury Social Centre” the comrades are keeping the read flag flying with an inclusive “communism” banner hanging out the upstairs window. Rather wonderfully they have both a Facebook and WordPress presence to truly demonstrate their anti-captilist stance. The WordPress site also has a Bookign form as the squat is apparently “a community space” and they’d “love for you to host your event here. All welcome!” (Told you that banner was inclusive). I wonder if they’d accept corporate bookings and if any of the students would be prepared to work as table service? After all times are tough and we’re all in it together and surely they’d not begrudge a bit of festive cheer to the working classes at this time of year. If anyone is worried about the risk of booking the venue they have reportedly had a health and safety assessment done so the “police can’t get them on health and safety grounds – from which I assume there are no law students involved. One of their main objections seems to be that the University plans to start using the building again and horror the new dean of post-grads will get “a luxury apartment in the top-floor of the building.” the bastard. Though I do agree with them that “our social spaces as well as our ability to organise are under attack” and whilst they may hope that squatting in a university building will tackle the issue, I can’t help but think helping to repair a run down old church hall might not achieve more.

As with every squat/occupation they have a Wish list, and looking at that I can’t help but observe that if someone did want to really cause any of these protests problems the wish lists are the way in – but then I’m not a very nice person. Of course many of these wish list items could apparently be gained by intercepting them before retail stores deliberately destroy them. All businesses obviously loving to spend time and resources destroying things rather than just throwing them out. I suspect those particular “occupiers” are too young to recall the times when you could buy electrical goods in jumble sales and the like, before the safety elf degreed that that was too dangerous as the cables might be a bit threadbare, so then they could only be sold for spares and now not at all. So the stores that used to donate food to shelters and might pass on electrical goods to charity now have to destroy them for fear of liability.

Still to end on a high note the lot over at St. Pauls have at least finally (I’m a bit late on this) after a mere six weeks decide what they want to ask Santa for for Christmas. Strangely the list doesn’t define the cut off point for being counted amongst the wealthiest nor what their “share” might be. Even more strangely they’re not asking Santa for a pony perhaps someone read them LegIrons story.

As the septicisle observes just six weeks to come up with the same list as UK uncut – they’ll prove the infinite monkeys theory right yet.

* As reported the police action strikes me as criminal destruction of property but I don’t know US laws.

 

All activities monitored by video camera Another November the 5th gone and another “quiet” walk around London with the indomitable Old Holborn, Olly Cromwell, Katabasis and others whose presence has been erased by alcohol (remind me if you want) – which was an utter blast. As has become our want we met in the pleasing environs of Chandos to exchange niceties, don costumes and imbibe a bracing drink before braving the autumnal air. Our dapper and well presented crew headed off down Whitehall, pausing to admire the security in place at that bastion of democracy that is Downing street. Setting the theme for the day they didn’t seem pleased to see us, undeterred we continued unto the very doors of the palace of Westminster where some terribly nice people told us that as the politicans don’t work on a Saturday it’d cost us 15 quid a head to get in:
Continue reading »

 

Light blue touch paper and retire So the Greeks appear to have lit the blue touch paper under the Euro project, by the crazy notion of asking the people what they think about a huge financial deal before signing up to it. Yet again the idea of a referendum seems to be throwing the euro-project into chaos and confusion, it would seem that democracy is as welcome to the eurocrats as water to the Witch of the West. There’s a lovely concise live(ish) blog of the “crisis” over at the FT (H/T Katabasis).

The choices facing the Greeks seem to be a referendum or an early election – I imagine if there’s an early election there’ll be an awful lot of things signed before then. Just in case someone gets in on a promise of a referendum or not signing up to the euro-cooked up agreement. Mind past expereince suggests that if the Greeks vote the wrong way they’ll just be given more chances to vote until they get it right – at least the ballot printing companies will do well out of it.

Interesting times, indeed – I can’t help but hope it blows up on Saturday just for the poetry of it.

 

Back to talking about the economy again I’m afraid, and you know it’s got bad when even the BBC have noticed something’s wrong (H/T Penny Dreadful). Sadly it seems that the terribly dangerous deflation we should all worry about hasn’t happened, instead by printing a metric truck load of cash we’ve got inflation. Which really wasn’t much of a surprise to anyone, and at least we can inflate our debt (which ok screws over all of us that can’t just vote ourselves a pay rise) but at least the countries credit rate isn’t heading rapidly towards junk status like say Greece. Greece being in the unenviable position of having a tanking economy, a populace that doesn’t like cuts and a rapidly dwindling set of people that will lend them money. Oh and being part of the Euro they can’t easily default or devalue their currency, and the great and good in Brussels are really not keen on people leaving the Euro. So with belts tightening all round where will their next bail out come from? Why the IMF of course as we’ve just terribly generously agreed to pay them an extra 9 billion pounds in membership fees next year. With cuts being such a hot topic this was of course agreed to in parliament by means of a Statutory Instrument and so won’t ever get debated – much simpler that way.

Still it’s not all gloom we’re told that by the next parliament we’ll stop giving £280 million a year to India in aid. Which given the aid they give to Africa, the nuclear and space programs they probably won’t miss all that much. Which still leaves the puzzle of how when we’re borrowing more money every day our politicians don’t calculate the amount of money we have spare to give away as zero. Never fear though the EU has sprung to our aid in response to our Government actually saying they were disappointed at the EU wanting even more money Guy Verhofstadt has suggested we could save money by just letting the EU take over everything (officially). To help that “saving” along the majority of MEP’s just voted in favour of the EU getting more money, and being able to tax us directly.

All that said if we could actually just get our glorious leaders to stop giving away money we don’t have, to support institutions we neither want nor need, things could actually be looking up as unemployment has (reportedly) peaked, and manufacturing may be still increasing. We could maybe even stop spending money trying to prevent global warming as it looks like a mini ice age is more likely. Now if the our learned representatives would only consider doing soemthign sensible with tax things could actually improve.

Of course I doubt if even William Hill would give you odds on that happening.

 

Terribly sorry to bang on about matters economic, but well it does seem a rather important topic, so please do indulge me. Just a quick whistle round a few bits in the news today.

First up, Guido rather nails the deliberate inflationary policy pursued by the Bank of England to protect the banks at our cost. That they invested in inflation proof securities whilst warning about deflation is a bit of a hint they may have been fibbing to us.

The government mean while continues it’s relentless pursuit of cuts and austerity by shelling out to build a brand new e-petitions system, rather than just you know turning the old one back on and then getting on with ignoring all the petitions.

Then when presented with a sensible drugs policy by a group of self appointed world elders rather than saying “hey, we could tax that shit”. Our glorious leaders decide to ignore yet more advice that legalising drugs is the way to go, because drugs are bad ok? (Inspector Gadget is unconvinced by the elders)

And finally (once again thanks to Penny Dreadful) it seems those crazy kids over at UK Uncut are going to protest Bono at Glastonbury – possibly the most expensive protest ever? Also sadly they’re going to protest against him not paying taxes he can legally get out of and not for being a smug sanctimonious git.

 

Just to follow up on yesterdays post on Tax freedom day, I realise I didn’t mention how much the EU spent. Thankfully due to an article brought to my attention by Penny Dreadful I can now correct this, as the Telegraph have all the gritty details all 9.2 billion of them!

9.2 Billion being the “Amount British taxpayers contributed to the EU in 2010.”, which makes the (presumably additional)

£3 billion

Amount of ‘stealth taxes’ to be levied on Britons under European Commission plans to generate one third of the EU budget by 2020 using direct taxation powers. ”

Quite a blow seeing as we’re all notionally trying to reduce our spending, well apart from the EU itself it seems. But of course the really worrying matter is how much of the money they take from us is gone but unaccounted for:

£94billion

The nine tenths of the EU’s budget in 2009 that was “materially affected” by irregularities, projects that included the spending of more than £350,000 “improving the lifestyle and living standard of dogs” in Hungary. ”

Remember the EU has never has it’s accounts signed off, and can’t keep to it’s own accounting rules, but that’s not stopping them demanding more money and the right to take it directly from us without even the pretence of our Government having a say in the matter. At which point what is the purpose of our national Government at all, then giving the EU a seat on the UN as a recognised state starts to make sense, and once it’s got that there’s no need for any of the EU members to have one is there?

 

Continuing my grand tradition of being late to the part it would seem that yesterday was Tax Freedom day the day of the year when we on average stop working to pay taxes and start working for ourselves. A mere 149 days into the year and an average of 40.8% of our income gone and that’s the taxes paid. Of course depending on what you buy, how much your earn etc. you own personal tax freedom day may have been a while back or you may have yet a bit to go. Tax freedom day would be a lot later in the year of course if it wasn’t for the fact that the government is still borrowing like crazy, they’d not need to do that so much if any actual cuts were being made. The problem is of course the way each party lavish money on it’s favourites and the next lot aren’t actually cut that so spending forever ratchets upwards. Mind with our credit rating being downgraded by the Chinese that borrowing may well come to a juddering halt.

So as we’ve worked longer to get to tax freedom this year than last, next year must surely be going to be better what with all the cuts. Cuts like Spending 44 million reviving the “change4life” campaigns, or increasing foreign development aid (only 0.7% more of course), or doing up number 10 yet again.

Maybe buying less to reduce the 29 days we work to pay our average VAT bill might be a good starting point (VAT now being forever pegged at 20%+ thanks to the EU). Or maybe support the EU Rerendum lot and thier campaign for referism – so that the government has to actually get our approval for the annual budget rather than just pretending to debate and scrutinise it. Though perhaps any such movement needs to be a teense more aggressive than we may be entirely comfortable with to have any chance of success, it has after all worked for others. In the meantime perhaps we need to start living the good life to avoid the state altogether ?

 

I’m going to be banging on about our supposed cuts yet again and the rather troublesome financial mess we may be in, and I suspect I’m going to keep doing so at least until we stop digging. All those terribly terribly harsh cuts didn’t stop our net deficit growing to 10 billion last month, nor is it stopping the EU giving away another billion (just Euro’s this time) for people to build robot pets and nagware. Thankfully it’s not all gloom* one of our elected troughers has brought forward a motion that we shouldn’t illegally bail out the Eurozone , but fear not just when we might hope for some sense the Government rides to the rescue with a wrecking bill (Hat tip Penny Dreadful). That’s right just when some says maybe we must not piss away more money illegally propping up the Eurozone the government (with the whips) amends it to say that we should maybe thing about not doing it. Ah that ever important difference between must and should.

If you’re still not convinced how bad a situation we’re in then you’re really not paying attention, even the left have realised that Labour must stop fighting the cuts (OK I admit they only realise this because they think it’s hurting their chance of getting back to power not for any principled reason – like say we’re broke, but still it’s progress of sorts). For a plausible look at what will happen if EU countries start to default on their debt, and thus what we could be sucked into if our Government continues to illegally fund Eurozone bailouts Andrew Lilico’s Telegraph article makes grim reading.

The alternative at least for the UK, as we’re not part of the EuroZone is to get our house in order, get the debt down to somewhere less eye gougingly painful, leave the Euro to sort out it’s own mess – and if we manage to not get sucked into it if we’re very lucky make a profit off the collapse. Someone somewhere will definitely make a profit out of the seemingly inevitable economic turmoil, even if it’s just the makers of tumbrils.

* I lied sorry.

Update A glimmer of good news after all it seems a whole 46 MPs had the courage to vote to prevent the government handing over our money to bailout the Eurozone.

Update 2 Almost forgot about this, if Andrew Lilico didn’t worry you how about a former head of the IMF who describes the EU bailouts as a Ponzi scheme?

 

Just a quick round up of further posts I’ve come across regarding the rally against debt, in particular order and without rhyme or reason.

Angry Exile over on Orphans of Liberty has a round up of where it’s being largely ignored by the main stream media and lists the ways to get out of the debt.

Brian Micklethwait has a lovely collection of photo’s of the various signs at the rally (hat tip Samizdata).

There’s a guest post over at Old Holborns wondering when wanting private enterprise and individual responsibility become a radical view point in this country.

 

For reasons that now escape me I’ve just finished watching The street that cut everything – this was an “experiment” where Nick Robinson persuades a street to give up all council services for 6 weeks. The very subtle (no honest it was subtle really – like a brick wall across Brandshatch) sub-text was that councils are terribly good value for money and that cuts can only affect vital services and are therefore evil.

That said I was hugely impressed with how well the street actually did, they managed to meet all the “challenges” aunty threw at them and stay on budget (just about – one can’t help but suspect that the additional challenges were set to make sure the budget didn’t last). The community (on the whole) pulled together and did a damn good job of going from having the council provide everything (including social interaction) to having to do it for themselves. Oddly as many dodgy libertarians might predict a community can actually pull together and choose to help each other out when asked to do so.

So that said, I may have hinted that I considered the “experiment” to be somewhat rigged. So lets ignore the in built slant to the situation in that no one on the street had any knowledge of any of the bits of legislation they were expected to adhere to, they also couldn’t make use of any of the economies of scale notionally available to the council. The best bit of rigging though was the funding they got, which was their council tax – so no slice of any central government funding, no slice of the business taxes, in fact nothing from any of the other funding streams that the council have. But I suppose in balance to that they didn’t have to pay anyone to do any of the jobs as they were doing it themselves (though then also had to also do jobs beyond their street as well). That though really was the huge hidden flaw – they were pretty much forced to organise along traditional council lines, there wasn’t the scope to really try anything radical. For instance they had to have weekly rubbish collections or they’d be fined – anyone had weekly rubbish collections of late? One of the residents insisted on free school meals and the same provision for getting their child to and from school and wouldn’t consider other options provided by the community – especially when it went wrong the first time it was tried.

So what the program did manage to show was that a single very small street, isn’t a viable self supporting community especially when people aren’t allowed to give additional money to the community. So wow if you ham-string a community it doesn’t do so well – who’d have thunk it.

© 2011 Anonymong Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha