<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Anonymong &#187; errata</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anonymong.org/category/errata/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anonymong.org</link>
	<description>Blind in one ear and deaf in one eye</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:52:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>99% revisited</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2011/10/14/99-revisited/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2011/10/14/99-revisited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[errata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[follow up]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=1961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2011/10/14/99-revisited/"></g:plusone></div>
One of the great things about the internet is that give it a chance and sooner or later someone will provide you with the information you were missing. which means I have to revisit my whole pondering of this 99% thing, as a rather informative article with charts has identified just which 99% they&#8217;re claiming <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2011/10/14/99-revisited/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2011/10/14/99-revisited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free the Bolton one</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/01/free-the-bolton-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/01/free-the-bolton-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[errata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sparticus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/01/free-the-bolton-one/"></g:plusone></div>
If you&#8217;re reading this you&#8217;ve probably already read about the plight of Nick Hogan, if not go and read about it over at Old Holborns and whilst you&#8217;re there make use of the donate button to chip in an help get him out of prison. I thought debtor&#8217;s prisons had been done away with but <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/01/free-the-bolton-one/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/01/free-the-bolton-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UKIP a correction</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/01/17/ukip-a-correction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/01/17/ukip-a-correction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 13:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[errata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/01/17/ukip-a-correction/"></g:plusone></div>
I really must apologise, my previous article UKIP losing the plot I&#8217;d rather presumed that UKIP wanted a blanket ban on the burqa. However as Dick Puddlecote points out over at Old Holborns this isn&#8217;t actually the case. They just want to ban it in public buildings and allow for it to be banned in <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/01/17/ukip-a-correction/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/01/17/ukip-a-correction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

