<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Anonymong &#187; photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anonymong.org/category/photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anonymong.org</link>
	<description>Blind in one ear and deaf in one eye</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:52:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Photographing buses</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2012/02/03/photographing-buses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2012/02/03/photographing-buses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=2230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2012/02/03/photographing-buses/"></g:plusone></div>
I was recently linked to an article that seemed to be bad news for photographers (sorry I forget who by), which I reposted on Facebook. I would have left it there, but for one of the comments I got which observed that the judgement was based on not the similarity of the pictures but on <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2012/02/03/photographing-buses/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2012/02/03/photographing-buses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best walk so far</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2011/11/07/best-walk-so-far/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2011/11/07/best-walk-so-far/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 20:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conformity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guy Fawkes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=2018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2011/11/07/best-walk-so-far/"></g:plusone></div>
Another November the 5th gone and another &#8220;quiet&#8221; walk around London with the indomitable Old Holborn, Olly Cromwell, Katabasis and others whose presence has been erased by alcohol (remind me if you want) &#8211; which was an utter blast. As has become our want we met in the pleasing environs of Chandos to exchange niceties, <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2011/11/07/best-walk-so-far/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2011/11/07/best-walk-so-far/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public spaces in London</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/11/22/public-spaces-in-london/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/11/22/public-spaces-in-london/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=1276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/11/22/public-spaces-in-london/"></g:plusone></div>
A while back I linked to the Evening Standard report on the new and improved ring of steel and the topic also game up both on the last little walk I went on and in comments about it. so it&#8217;s interesting to note that the London Assembly Planning and Housing Committee are &#8220;reportedly&#8221; going to <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/11/22/public-spaces-in-london/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/11/22/public-spaces-in-london/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You can&#8217;t trust a copper</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/27/you-cant-trust-a-copper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/27/you-cant-trust-a-copper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=1086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/27/you-cant-trust-a-copper/"></g:plusone></div>
It&#8217;s true it seems you can&#8217;t trust a copper to actually know the law they&#8217;re meant to be enforcing. The Metropolitan police commissioner has admitted that his police sometimes forget the law on photography (not that it&#8217;s been a high profile issue or anything), and of course the plastic police have been found to delete <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/27/you-cant-trust-a-copper/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/27/you-cant-trust-a-copper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>They really don&#8217;t like photographers do they</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/31/they-really-dont-like-photographers-do-they/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/31/they-really-dont-like-photographers-do-they/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital economy bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/31/they-really-dont-like-photographers-do-they/"></g:plusone></div>
The original of this article is over on Copyright Action, but they seem to be having bandwidth issues so I reproduce it in it&#8217;s entirety here. (reproduced with permission and all copyright and content remains © Copyright Action 2008 &#8211; 2009). When you&#8217;ve finished reading this consider a few things: 1) The police are generally <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/31/they-really-dont-like-photographers-do-they/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/31/they-really-dont-like-photographers-do-they/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Economy Bill &#8211; Petiton Harriet</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/24/digital-economy-bill-petiton-harriet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/24/digital-economy-bill-petiton-harriet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital economy bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/24/digital-economy-bill-petiton-harriet/"></g:plusone></div>
Currently the Digital economy bill, is still trundling it&#8217;s way through parliament without any proper debate or anyone much taking a look at it. On Thursday Harriet Harman will have to explain the Government&#8217;s plans for this bill so before then write to her and ask that it be given proper time for a full <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/24/digital-economy-bill-petiton-harriet/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/24/digital-economy-bill-petiton-harriet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not a terrorist? &#8211; doesn&#8217;t matter</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/02/22/not-a-terrorist-doesnt-matter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/02/22/not-a-terrorist-doesnt-matter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/02/22/not-a-terrorist-doesnt-matter/"></g:plusone></div>
Via Old Holborn on Facebook and already picked up on by LegIron and Obnoxio it seems that the plastic plod still haven&#8217;t got the message about not harassing photographers. Taking photographs of Christmas festivities in that well known security hotspot of Accrington is &#8220;Suspicious&#8221; behaviour and if you don&#8217;t &#8220;volunteer&#8221; your details when stopped under <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/02/22/not-a-terrorist-doesnt-matter/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/02/22/not-a-terrorist-doesnt-matter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photography in public places the battle continues</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/12/28/photography-in-public-places-the-battle-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/12/28/photography-in-public-places-the-battle-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 00:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2009/12/28/photography-in-public-places-the-battle-continues/"></g:plusone></div>
You can tell that the problem with the police harassing photographers for taking pictures in public places is getting serious when 365 establishment photographer write a letter to the Telegraph (hat tip Samizdata). If things get much worse they&#8217;ll write to the editor of the Times and use green ink. Now I&#8217;m not convinced this <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2009/12/28/photography-in-public-places-the-battle-continues/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/12/28/photography-in-public-places-the-battle-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News for photographers</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/09/21/news-for-photographers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/09/21/news-for-photographers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2009/09/21/news-for-photographers/"></g:plusone></div>
This just in via FitWatch, the Met have updated their guidelines for stopping and searching terrorists photographers, to clarify that they can only see your photographs if they suspect you of being a terrorist and also that they have no right to delete digital photographs or destroy film. They actually state that twice, with regards <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2009/09/21/news-for-photographers/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/09/21/news-for-photographers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photography &#8211; a further followup</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/03/17/photography-a-further-followup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/03/17/photography-a-further-followup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/2009/03/17/photography-a-further-followup/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2009/03/17/photography-a-further-followup/"></g:plusone></div>
Just came across these two articles which I thought needed sharing. For anyone that thinks that the counter terrorism and other acts won&#8217;t be used to harass photographers and prevent them from carrying out their legitimate work, I&#8217;d suggest reading this little list of incidents where that has happened, and the number of commentators complaining <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2009/03/17/photography-a-further-followup/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/03/17/photography-a-further-followup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

