<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Anonymong &#187; politicians</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anonymong.org/category/politicians/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anonymong.org</link>
	<description>Blind in one ear and deaf in one eye</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:27:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Appearance and aspiration will be subject to state control</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/26/appearance-and-aspiration-will-be-subject-to-state-control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/26/appearance-and-aspiration-will-be-subject-to-state-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[conformity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ConDems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=1083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They really can&#8217;t stop them selves it seems, proving that they can be just as keen on controlling every aspect of our lives as the last lot. To counter the cultural pressures of thin models our new equalities minister has it seems decreed that the new approved size and shape to aspire to is size <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/26/appearance-and-aspiration-will-be-subject-to-state-control/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/26/appearance-and-aspiration-will-be-subject-to-state-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stuff to read elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/16/stuff-to-read-elsewhere/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/16/stuff-to-read-elsewhere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plug]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=1076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of things for your Friday delectation. Firstly via comments over on Anna Raccoon there is the wonder that is Daed Parrot&#8217;s Sleaze-O-scope. A one stop shop for locating all the latest sleaze. And utterly unrelated to that a rather jolly rant against recycling. Bookmark to:]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/16/stuff-to-read-elsewhere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the &#8220;alternative vote&#8221; system</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/06/07/what-is-the-alternative-vote-system/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/06/07/what-is-the-alternative-vote-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 18:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=1035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Produced by a friend of mine a rather amusing explanation of the &#8220;alternative vote&#8221; electoral system: I still remain unconvinced that it&#8217;d be a change for the better. Bookmark to:]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/06/07/what-is-the-alternative-vote-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Laws &#8211; adding noise not light</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/31/david-laws-adding-noise-not-light/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/31/david-laws-adding-noise-not-light/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 22:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[expenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=1032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lots of other bloggers have already made far better comments about David Laws than I will, but despite that I&#8217;m going to stick my oar in. Mainly because I&#8217;d hate for our politicians to get the slightest hint that we&#8217;ve lost interest in their expenses. One thing that does make a nice change is the <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/31/david-laws-adding-noise-not-light/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/31/david-laws-adding-noise-not-light/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The coalition of the purple</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/29/the-coalition-of-the-purple/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/29/the-coalition-of-the-purple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 18:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tin foil hat time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now as promised/threatened I&#8217;m afraid I&#8217;m returning to the matter of the &#8220;take back parliament&#8221; coalition. Firstly though a correction to my earlier post in that Mark Ross appears to have no connection to Ekklesia except they published a puff blog for Take Back Parliament, so sorry about that. Anyway onto looking at how they <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/29/the-coalition-of-the-purple/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/29/the-coalition-of-the-purple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How they are related</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/20/how-they-are-related/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/20/how-they-are-related/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 23:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Betrayal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tin foil hat time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So back to the purple brigade, and many many thanks to Woman on a Raft for supplying me with some of this information (see comments here and here). I was getting quite confused as to how all the main players were related so I put together a bit of a family tree to try to <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/20/how-they-are-related/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/20/how-they-are-related/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reply from Greenpeace</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/18/reply-from-greenpeace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/18/reply-from-greenpeace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 10:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[follow up]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well that was terribly quick, Greenpeace have replied to my email already, though they don&#8217;t address my second point at all nor mention if they&#8217;ll be carrying out similar campaigns in other countries. Oh and it would have been nice if they could have spelt my name correctly. Anyway here&#8217;s the reply: &#8220;Hello Gioalla and <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/18/reply-from-greenpeace/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/18/reply-from-greenpeace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prescient campaigning</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/18/prescient-campaigning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/18/prescient-campaigning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 00:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Betrayal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sell out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tin foil hat time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much as I hate to bang on about the purple people over at &#8220;Take Back Parliament&#8221; but just noticed something rather interesting the domains takebackparliament.com and takebackparliament.org were registered before the election. Both domains were registered by Blue State Digitial on the 29th April as can be clearly seen from the whois data: Domain Name: <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/18/prescient-campaigning/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/18/prescient-campaigning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A letter to GreenPeace</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/17/a-letter-to-greenpeace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/17/a-letter-to-greenpeace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 22:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sell out]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Greenpeace an international environmental campaign are backing &#8220;Take back Parliament&#8221; which strikes me as a tad odd, I thought I&#8217;d write to them and ask: 1) How it fitted with their other campaigns and will they be campaigning in other countries? 2) If they felt it was appropriate for an international charity such as <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/17/a-letter-to-greenpeace/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/17/a-letter-to-greenpeace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Purple power</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/16/purple-power/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/16/purple-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 23:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[band wagon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The demands for electoral reform continue apace even if the Take back Parliament campaign isn&#8217;t really a grass roots campaign. Apart from the groups acknowledge as being behind it on the website a quick whois lookup shows the campaign is being handled by Blue state digitial which must be costing someone a pretty penny. But <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/16/purple-power/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/16/purple-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
