I was somewhat surprised by the lack of traffic this morning on certain social networking sites about the demotion of Sir Fred Goodwin to plain old Mr Goodwin. There was a certain rumble but nothing like the massed ranks of gloaters I’d expected. Perhaps, I thought, given the British public’s legendary propensity for justice and goodwill, people had decided, justice having been done, that it was best to leave the man to repent in peace.

I scrubbed that idea when I realised it was patently rubbish.

I suspect the quietude we are currently seeing on this particular front is down to neither side of the political debate being able to claim crowing rights in the matter.

The left can hardly bleat. It was under dear old Tony Blair that the lowly Mr Goodwin was elevated to the peerage for “Services to banking”. I toyed with the idea of putting together a novelty forfeiture committee certificate saying he’d been stripped of the accolade “For services exclusively to banking while ignoring the risks to the rest of us poor proles” but thought better of it.

The left, in this instant, stood by and did nothing while the bankers rose to fame. I can’t remember much in the way of vocal protest at the time and while the Labour Party basked in the kind of attention from business of which they had hitherto only guiltily dreamed it’s not all that surprising.

But while the left could be accused of sleeping on the watch, the right have little claim on the moral high ground either. I may have to plough through a slack handful of Hansards to prove my point but I don’t recall the great PMQ speeches of Messrs Hague, Duncan Smith, Howard or indeed Cameron decrying the level of fawning and sycophancy towards the financial elite during Labour’s terms. Neither can I remember any mass protests in the streets or indeed in the commons demanding tougher regulation for the multi-billion-pound casinos using the fabric of our economy for chips. Then again I don’t remember them saying much about spending too much and not saving for the future. Can’t bring a single speech to mind. The memory is such a fragile thing.

As for the current leadership of both the left and the right neither seem particularly keen to say much on the subject now the deed is done. Four years after the cataclysm, Mr Milliband might be asked why he hadn’t called for such a thing before or why he wasn’t now calling for the heads of other ennobled members of the board of RBS.

Likewise Mr Cameron seems reluctant to engage in the debate, perhaps for fear of exposing the truth, which is that rather than a Conservative party Röhm-Putsch to cleanse the organisation of it’s backstairs bastards and draw a line under the affair, the grandees have circled the wagons and thrown dear old Freddie out to face the Sioux with an archery target painted on his gingham shirt.

Her Majesty, I suspect has the best complaint but is restricted by noblesse oblige from complaining about being called upon by a former PR Executive to wield the sceptre against such a transparently sacrificial goat.

No. Whatever your political complexion there’s little schadenfreude to be gained from Mr Goodwin’s exit from the other place. The whole episode was a disgrace for us all.

Fear not though, there is one thing you can think of which will unite us all with a wry smile at Freddie’s descent back in to the the ranks.

No doubt when he was ennobled Mr Goodwin will have done what all those gaining a new title do. On gaining a PHD I understand the majority’s reaction is to change ones stationary and particulars to reflect the new letters before ones name. Of course being a diligent manager of RBS, Mr G will have taken out an account with his own company and had his cards changed in a heartbeat.

So we can all sit back now with a warm feeling in our hearts as we think of him finally getting a chance to see what it’s like to be a customer of a high street bank in Britain, the like of which he once commanded.

Imagine trying to explain to ‘Rebecca’, the hard pressed engineering graduate from Mumbai that you haven’t lost your plastic or had it stolen, you’ve simply fallen from grace. I suspect there isn’t a form for that.

He’ll presumably have to repeat the exercise with Adam & Company, who, I understand, now deal with his finances on a day to day basis.

When you tire of that image (as you may within a month or so), refresh the smile by imagining him explaining it all again to the DVLA in Swansea.

 

As the rest of today is going to involve the serious business of visiting friends and getting drunk, possibly in that order. I’d just like to wish all/both of my readers and various commentators a happy new year and pray god the next one’s better than the last.

Usual lack of service will resume once the planned for hangover is gone, I plan to drink my months recommended drinking tonight as a minimum. Who knows I might even try to update a bit more next year.

Have fun everyone … it’ll annoy the puritans.

 

Having clearly demonstrated to the public at large that the police are at least currently not able/willing* to protect peoples saftey, homes and livelihoods and generally not being keen on people protecting themselves it’d seem that some council jobsworths aren’t even keen on letting people try and clean up their neighbourhoods due to the all powerful safety elf (hat tip London Cleanup).

Meanwhile Darcus Howe is an utter cock.

 

OK I promise not to say too much more about the AV referendum, I’ve been and voted, and really most everything that could be said has been. However I’m seeing loads of pro-AV articles at the moment, and there is a huge fallacy they’re promoting that is really starting to get on my nerves. The claim that to win in AV you have to have majority support is just nonsense, as a simplistic example can show (well simplistic examples are popular with Yes2AV so I don’t see why I can’t use them).

Let’s consider 10 voters just because it makes the maths easy, and they’re voting for a whole 5 parties. Voting as follows:

Parties
Voters Party 1 Party 2 Party 3 Party 4 Party 5
Voter A 1 2 3 4
Voter B 1 2 2 3
Voter C 1 2 4 3
Voter D 1 2 4 3
Voter E 3 2 4 1
Voter F 2 1 3
Voter G 2 3 1
Voter H 1 2 3
Voter I 1 2 3
Voter G 1 2 3

So with out hypothetical votes cast lest see what happens:

Round one Party 1 and Party 2 both have 3 first preference votes, so more than the other parties so they go through. The parties with the least first preference votes now get dropped, so goodbye to parties 3 and 4. Party 5 got 2 votes so they go through to round two.

In round two Party 1 picks up one second preference vote giving it 4 votes.

Party 2 doesn’t pick up any second preference votes so still has 3 votes.

Party 5 also doesn’t have any second preference votes so still has two votes.

So that ends the counting and Party 1 wins with 40% of the vote and so gets in on a minority of the votes, when the electorate would rather have been governed by someone else. In fact on the strength of second preference votes Party3 is by far the most popular choice with a stonking 80% os the second preference votes. Too bad they got knocked out on the first count.

So there you go, AV still not making sure that the winning party actually has any support from the majority of the population. Fantastic.

Yes I know this is contrived, but it makes the maths simpler and the various, cat Vs. dogs and pubs Vs. coffee were equally contrived so as a popular idiom would have it “bite me”. Oh sorry for the lack of graphics, they’re really not my strong point, if someone wants to make a flash movie then be my guest.

 

Just in case anyone was wondering, the server Anonymong is hosted on fell over rather seriously, and I’ve had to wait to be migrated to a new server and for everything to be restored. It looks like it’s all survived roughly intact – however I shall take advantage of the outage to just ignore all the things I’ve been meaning to comment on whilst work and other things have been busy and give myself a fresh start.

 

Hindsight is a wonderful thing, and predictions not written down are easy to get right. However I recall quite a few years back wondering aloud to many people why the various factions in Northern Ireland were bothering as with the EU it’d all become moot anyway, as they’d just be regions of a greater EU state. I wasn’t that politically aware back then but with a single currency and European passports it seemed the logical end point, and once we were all just “Europeans” what would they be fighting for exactly?

Via Leg Iron and by way of Witterings from Witney it seems the Irish have now noticed that they have in fact given away 400 years of struggle for independence. The Irish Times asks if “this is what the men of 1916 died for“, as Archbishop Cranmer observed they didn’t even make it to the centenary of their independence. I wonder when or if the Irish people as a whole will realise fully what’s happened and what they’ll then do about it. They do after all have a recent history of causing trouble and have a bit of a reputation for their ability to cause mischief.

Closer to home back in the 90′s Margaret Thatcher appears to have been on the money as to the effect the Euro would have on weaker economies. So as the Irish state looses autonomy to the bankers of the EU, perhaps we still have time to ask questions about the state of our independence – after all we have Dave’s cast iron guarantee. Hopefully we’ll not be as quick to squander the sacrifice of generations to gain and keep our sovereignty and freedoms as our Irish brethren have been – or maybe the next episode of X-factor will let us all sleep walk into the waiting arms of the EU. Though as Douglas Carswell observes we may already be past that point as the Lisbon treaty already means we have no choice about helping to bail out the Irish – on terms decided by the EU.

Update: As every Leg Iron has a good take on matters

 

I find myself feeling somewhat like the less virtuous player in the story of “St. Peter and the gossip”, over at the Devils Kitchen I made a comment about Ms. Penny which really didn’t need making. For this I would like to offer my apologies, though I realise no apology is an undo switch.

I do stand by what I said but not everything needs saying – I shall offer no further comment or explanation for fear of appearing to make excuses for behaviour which falls short of the level of politenss I try to aspire to.

I shall however* say that Ms. Penny was a most welcoming host, when I had occassion to visit her and my comments were in no way based on any behaviour at that time.

* There’s always an excep or however isn’t there.

 

ShallowWater Horizon

More seriously though excellent commentary of the spill here including a link to a list of large oil spills of history.

P.S. For those that are curious it’s a survey rig for Thame Water

P.P.S Rather fun Guess the size of leak widget

© 2011 Anonymong Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha