<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Anonymong &#187; ConDems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anonymong.org/tag/condems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anonymong.org</link>
	<description>Blind in one ear and deaf in one eye</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:52:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A year of ConDem Nation</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2011/05/11/a-year-of-condem-nation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2011/05/11/a-year-of-condem-nation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 22:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CondDems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[follow up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[band wagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ConDems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=1593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2011/05/11/a-year-of-condem-nation/"></g:plusone></div>
So a year ago today the country got rid of the pox that was Gordon Brown (and he&#8217;s only been back to parliament once despite being re-elected). So what&#8217;s happened since then, well we&#8217;re onto our second consultation about repealing laws with no laws yet repealed* (we obviously asked for the wrong ones to be <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2011/05/11/a-year-of-condem-nation/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2011/05/11/a-year-of-condem-nation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A miscellany of idiocy</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/11/14/a-miscellany-of-idiocy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/11/14/a-miscellany-of-idiocy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 21:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CondDems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ConDems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stupidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summer of rage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=1245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/11/14/a-miscellany-of-idiocy/"></g:plusone></div>
Having muttered about the student &#8220;demo&#8221; previously I find myself returning to the subject due to comments made by other commentators and people that were there. From the title of this post you can probably gather that I disagree with their points really quite strongly. But of course it&#8217;s not just supporters of the student <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/11/14/a-miscellany-of-idiocy/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/11/14/a-miscellany-of-idiocy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why we still need to go walking</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/10/13/why-we-still-need-to-go-walking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/10/13/why-we-still-need-to-go-walking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CondDems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ConDems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=1176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/10/13/why-we-still-need-to-go-walking/"></g:plusone></div>
Having just recently plugged a rather nice afternoon stroll, today brings reminders as to why such strolling is still needed as a minimum. The new bosses really are the same as the old bosses (but then they probably always were going to be, especially if you subscribe to the view that they&#8217;re just following orders <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/10/13/why-we-still-need-to-go-walking/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/10/13/why-we-still-need-to-go-walking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rolling back legislation</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/09/14/rolling-back-legislation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/09/14/rolling-back-legislation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CondDems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ConDems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=1127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/09/14/rolling-back-legislation/"></g:plusone></div>
As other people have already commented our new lords and master in the condem alliance don&#8217;t seem to be in a terrible hurry to remove all the bad legislation that our previous glorious leaders brought in to trample on our freedoms. However over at The Register I learn that they are amending the utterly abysmal <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/09/14/rolling-back-legislation/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/09/14/rolling-back-legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appearance and aspiration will be subject to state control</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/26/appearance-and-aspiration-will-be-subject-to-state-control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/26/appearance-and-aspiration-will-be-subject-to-state-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[conformity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ConDems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=1083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/26/appearance-and-aspiration-will-be-subject-to-state-control/"></g:plusone></div>
They really can&#8217;t stop them selves it seems, proving that they can be just as keen on controlling every aspect of our lives as the last lot. To counter the cultural pressures of thin models our new equalities minister has it seems decreed that the new approved size and shape to aspire to is size <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/26/appearance-and-aspiration-will-be-subject-to-state-control/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/26/appearance-and-aspiration-will-be-subject-to-state-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberty is what they say it is</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/13/liberty-is-what-they-say-it-is/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/13/liberty-is-what-they-say-it-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ConDems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=1061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/13/liberty-is-what-they-say-it-is/"></g:plusone></div>
This topic has already been covered incredibly well by other people so I&#8217;m actually going to just link to them, adding my voice to the many disappointed but not at all surprised voices responding to Mr Cleggs &#8220;shock&#8221; revelation that having asked the public for comment on what laws to repeal/amend he&#8217;s as much intention <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/13/liberty-is-what-they-say-it-is/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/13/liberty-is-what-they-say-it-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And now back to the bad</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/13/and-now-back-to-the-bad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/13/and-now-back-to-the-bad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 13:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ConDems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/13/and-now-back-to-the-bad/"></g:plusone></div>
Whilst I obviously welcome our new overlords, I can&#8217;t help but notice that they seem to have an odd idea of electoral reform, and as Tom Harris observes it doesn&#8217;t really fit well with either the Tories claim to want to return power to the people, and quite odd that the LibDems seem to be <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/13/and-now-back-to-the-bad/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/13/and-now-back-to-the-bad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

