<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Anonymong &#187; Digital economy bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anonymong.org/tag/digital-economy-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anonymong.org</link>
	<description>Blind in one ear and deaf in one eye</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:52:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>I am Pornacus</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/12/22/i-am-pornacus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/12/22/i-am-pornacus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 20:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sparticus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital economy bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Porn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=1397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/12/22/i-am-pornacus/"></g:plusone></div>
So the government have come up with another jolly wheeze to control the Internet, we have to opt in to be allowed to access &#8220;porn&#8221; on computers we pay for over connections provided at our expense by private companies. Oh and as Anna Raccoon points out anything with too much of #FFE5B4 could be iffy. <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/12/22/i-am-pornacus/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/12/22/i-am-pornacus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paranoid triangulation</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/09/22/paranoid-triangulation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/09/22/paranoid-triangulation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital economy bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tin foil hat time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=1138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/09/22/paranoid-triangulation/"></g:plusone></div>
A couple of unrelated articles caught my eye a bit today and led me to wonder just how unrelated they really where, or rather to ponder the impact of both of them coming to pass. Old Holborn highlighted the NUJ calling for state support for the vital democratic work of &#8220;proper&#8221; journalists. Rather than deal <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/09/22/paranoid-triangulation/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/09/22/paranoid-triangulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>They really don&#8217;t like photographers do they</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/31/they-really-dont-like-photographers-do-they/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/31/they-really-dont-like-photographers-do-they/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital economy bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/31/they-really-dont-like-photographers-do-they/"></g:plusone></div>
The original of this article is over on Copyright Action, but they seem to be having bandwidth issues so I reproduce it in it&#8217;s entirety here. (reproduced with permission and all copyright and content remains © Copyright Action 2008 &#8211; 2009). When you&#8217;ve finished reading this consider a few things: 1) The police are generally <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/31/they-really-dont-like-photographers-do-they/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/31/they-really-dont-like-photographers-do-they/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Economy Bill &#8211; Petiton Harriet</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/24/digital-economy-bill-petiton-harriet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/24/digital-economy-bill-petiton-harriet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital economy bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/24/digital-economy-bill-petiton-harriet/"></g:plusone></div>
Currently the Digital economy bill, is still trundling it&#8217;s way through parliament without any proper debate or anyone much taking a look at it. On Thursday Harriet Harman will have to explain the Government&#8217;s plans for this bill so before then write to her and ask that it be given proper time for a full <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/24/digital-economy-bill-petiton-harriet/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/24/digital-economy-bill-petiton-harriet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This is getting silly</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/05/this-is-getting-silly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/05/this-is-getting-silly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital economy bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/05/this-is-getting-silly/"></g:plusone></div>
I&#8217;ve been meaning to write about the Digital economy bill for a while, but life has been getting in the way and it just keeps getting sillier. Plus of course loads of other people are providing excellent commentary faster than I was getting round to it, but I&#8217;ve never let being late to the party <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/05/this-is-getting-silly/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/05/this-is-getting-silly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

