Via the ever well informed Katabasis my attention has been drawn to the rather worrying seizure of computers owned by UK climate sceptic bloggers. Apparently at the behest of the U.S. Department of Justice as other climate bloggers have received nasty grams (cache) from our friends across the pond. Last I checked the climategate e-mails where mainly (allegedly) pilfered from UK sources, and even ignoring that the emails are widely available so the US Department of Justice could just download their own copy. All in all a quite worrying development, state funded “scientific” research into climate change wasn’t a matter of national security last I checked. Rather generally the scientific method in the past has been to share research far and wide for verification and the like, so why are the powers that be on both sides of the pond going for climate bloggers?

I can’t help but suspect there may be more to this than meets the eye.

Do spread the word, and don’t forget to keep off site backups.

Updates: JoNova observes:
Now, more than ever, all the people that value their freedom need to stick together. Whistleblowers and radio personalities need blogger back up, big bloggers need small bloggers, every blogger needs commenter and emailer support, with letters to editors and friends. Every link in the chain helps. The establishment need to know that we will not be intimidated, there are many of us, and the more they push, the more we will tell the world.
and in the comments there:
They took away a DSL router? That would only be done by “experts” to frustrate access to the Internet.

And Watts Up With That? have been in contact with Roger (Tallbloke) and he tells me that he is not a suspect, and that they’ll clone his hard drives and return the computers to him.

Which is good news, and hopefully they’ll return everything quickly and undamaged (which doesn’t always happen) – this still seems really rather odd.

 

We need more government Yes once more I’m returning to those crazy kids of the occupy movement, in a week where the LAPD have reportedly been destorying occupy tents* apparently up in Edinburgh the little bit of weather they’ve been having has cleared that camp quite effectively. As the lovely picture from Punk rock Libertarians wonderfully illustrates despite objectionable (and they have objected) tactics from the police the occupy movement seems to continue to call for more government control (of everyone else).

Over her on the more civilised side of the pond our police sent round a badly titled memo warning business people in the city that they’d had reports that some elements of the occupy movement might get up to unpleasant shenanigans and hijinks in the run up to Christmas. No doubt fuelled by copious amounts of non-alchoholic fair trade organic egg-nog. The occupy lot rather took objection to being on the same standard memo as other more nasty people, I’d have thought they’d have been chuffed to be being taken seriously. The warning seems reasonable given the mess that previous related marches and such like have caused.

The London crowd though seem to be made of cannier stuff and have prepared for winter by on the back of the strikes the other week, have “occupied” a variety of unoccupied buildings – something that used to be called squatting when I were an even younger lad. My current favourite of these is the Bloomsbury square squat.

Bloomsbury square squat Renamed by the squatters as the “Bloomsbury Social Centre” the comrades are keeping the read flag flying with an inclusive “communism” banner hanging out the upstairs window. Rather wonderfully they have both a Facebook and WordPress presence to truly demonstrate their anti-captilist stance. The WordPress site also has a Bookign form as the squat is apparently “a community space” and they’d “love for you to host your event here. All welcome!” (Told you that banner was inclusive). I wonder if they’d accept corporate bookings and if any of the students would be prepared to work as table service? After all times are tough and we’re all in it together and surely they’d not begrudge a bit of festive cheer to the working classes at this time of year. If anyone is worried about the risk of booking the venue they have reportedly had a health and safety assessment done so the “police can’t get them on health and safety grounds – from which I assume there are no law students involved. One of their main objections seems to be that the University plans to start using the building again and horror the new dean of post-grads will get “a luxury apartment in the top-floor of the building.” the bastard. Though I do agree with them that “our social spaces as well as our ability to organise are under attack” and whilst they may hope that squatting in a university building will tackle the issue, I can’t help but think helping to repair a run down old church hall might not achieve more.

As with every squat/occupation they have a Wish list, and looking at that I can’t help but observe that if someone did want to really cause any of these protests problems the wish lists are the way in – but then I’m not a very nice person. Of course many of these wish list items could apparently be gained by intercepting them before retail stores deliberately destroy them. All businesses obviously loving to spend time and resources destroying things rather than just throwing them out. I suspect those particular “occupiers” are too young to recall the times when you could buy electrical goods in jumble sales and the like, before the safety elf degreed that that was too dangerous as the cables might be a bit threadbare, so then they could only be sold for spares and now not at all. So the stores that used to donate food to shelters and might pass on electrical goods to charity now have to destroy them for fear of liability.

Still to end on a high note the lot over at St. Pauls have at least finally (I’m a bit late on this) after a mere six weeks decide what they want to ask Santa for for Christmas. Strangely the list doesn’t define the cut off point for being counted amongst the wealthiest nor what their “share” might be. Even more strangely they’re not asking Santa for a pony perhaps someone read them LegIrons story.

As the septicisle observes just six weeks to come up with the same list as UK uncut – they’ll prove the infinite monkeys theory right yet.

* As reported the police action strikes me as criminal destruction of property but I don’t know US laws.

 

Light blue touch paper and retire So the Greeks appear to have lit the blue touch paper under the Euro project, by the crazy notion of asking the people what they think about a huge financial deal before signing up to it. Yet again the idea of a referendum seems to be throwing the euro-project into chaos and confusion, it would seem that democracy is as welcome to the eurocrats as water to the Witch of the West. There’s a lovely concise live(ish) blog of the “crisis” over at the FT (H/T Katabasis).

The choices facing the Greeks seem to be a referendum or an early election – I imagine if there’s an early election there’ll be an awful lot of things signed before then. Just in case someone gets in on a promise of a referendum or not signing up to the euro-cooked up agreement. Mind past expereince suggests that if the Greeks vote the wrong way they’ll just be given more chances to vote until they get it right – at least the ballot printing companies will do well out of it.

Interesting times, indeed – I can’t help but hope it blows up on Saturday just for the poetry of it.

 

So almost a week since the looting and huge swathes of forest has been sacrificed to discuss the cause of the unrest and more importantly who was to blame. I am of course going to add to the sound and fury being generated, mainly because some of the commentary has rather tickled my sense of the absurd.

One of the early “causes” of the looting proffered by the punditry, was that youth centres had been shut down and more people had said if the youth centres shut down they’d be trouble/riots/the end of civilisation as we know it. Now to me that seems rather like a protection racket at least as old as the Vikings.
“nice village you’ve got there, hand over the danegeld and it won’t get burnt down”
“nice shops you’ve got there, now how about some youth centres to make sure they don’t get looted”*
Now the closure of these vital youth centres without which apparently the youth turn into a rampaging mob was down to evil Tory cuts, despite the fact that government spending is still increasing. The thing I can’t help but wonder though is how many youth clubs, scout groups and who knows what else have shut down or reduced in scale due to the cost and hassle of the all pervasive CRB check? As many people have observed children used to entertain themselves, then health and safety came along so adults had to be invovled, then the CRB check came along and it became difficult for the adults to be involved. Community provision for the young no longer involves a few sticking plasters and a large amount of orange squash, but instead paying the government to make suitable provision – pricing it out of the range of many communities. The idea of people providing for themselves has been quite thoroughly drummed out of us.

Meanwhile the looting had something for everyone, helped by the rapid charging of large numbers of people including teachers, millionaires daughters, Olympic ambassadors and the whole gamut of society. Proving as previously observed that the take what you want attitude really is quite pervasive. Which means the pundits can blame the welfare state, the cuts to the welfare state, greedy bankers, greedy youth anyone. You want to blame a group they were there. Even amongst the communities responding to the looting you could pick and choose there were brave Sikhs, Turks defending temples and shops and “racist thugs” out looking for trouble. So they were about race but we mustn’t bring race into it**.

If that wasn’t enough to keep everyone happy it was also an underclass uprising ‘Showing the rich we do what we want’, the rich apparently being anyone with a business or job like 89 yeard old barbers. Ignoring the fact that even the worst off of them are better off than 90% of the planet so it was perhaps a mollycoddled mob. The police who days before were murderous thugs were now not going in hard enough, and people were calling for the army to be called in.

Sadly the collective blaming amusing as it in many ways is, has led to a typical statist reaction from almost(?) all quarters of the Government. The way to prevent these things recurring, isn’t for courts to give meaningful sentences that might restore the connection between action and consequence, instead we’re all to be punished – or at least those of us who care about obeying the law in the first place. face coverings may be banned, the Government wants to be able to shut down social networks when there’s unrest, and there are calls for the law to change retrospectively to remove looters benefits and of course the old favourite of re-introducing some form of national service. The fall out from these riots for all seasons are going to take some watching.

* Yes I know it’s not that simple, and that not all youth are like that or even all youth centres state funded etc.
** Why is it frowned upon to describe areas as “white working class” but not say “chinese”, “muslim” or “black”?

 

Seeing as today seems to be a day for lazy comparisons I thought I’d join in the fun and games, the relationship between my tongue and my cheek is left as an exercise to the readers.

Currently we are told have poor disenfranchised youths (who can afford to buy blackberry’s) finding their voice by looting shops, and lashing out at a society that told them to consume but that they were entitled to everything so didn’t need to work, or if you prefer the other narrative couldn’t find work despite being law abiding lovely people. This is just them reclaiming their power.

This has been variously compared to the Tottenham/Brixton race riots of the 80′s and even the poll tax riots. Because the government has been doing what it does best and ignoring peaceful and not so peaceful protests and well the Tories are in power so it’s just like Maggie being back innit! (Though comparing call-me-Dave to Thatcher is a hell of a stretch). Having given this some thought I don’t think these comparisons go nearly far enough (to quote Tom Lehrer out of context) and really these people are missing a wonderful bit of hyperbole.

Here’s a check list for a much “better” comparison:

Rampant consumer culture – allegedly
High inflation due to printing money – check
People being told that they don’t have work due to a specific segment of society – check
Roaming gangs of youth attacking/looting those that have more than them – check
High unemployment – check
Organised criminality hiding behind spontaneous violence – check
Socialists politicians telling the “disenfranchised” they’re entitled to have the state provide everything – check

So I do believe that if we can just find a Reichtstag to burn down, why then we may have the set.

Do feel free to add any comparisons I may have missed.

 

I’m rather fond of London, even the bits I don’t like I’m quite fond of – apart from a sojourn out in the depths of Essex for a long decade I’ve lived somewhere within it’s environs for my entire life. This means that I get more than a bit miffed when some miserable hooligans decide to smash the place up, because they want to play the hard man and get a load of shitty consumer products for free. I actually get quite annoyed by such behaviour, and am more than unimpressed by bits of the media describing them as protesters.

An awful lot of people have spoken an awful lot of sense over the last few days and tomorrow I’m going to re-read it and maybe do a round up as much has been said better than I’m going to. Tonight though I shall have a beer, hope that no one I know gets caught up in it and wonder what sort of brain dead thugs are currently running lose in London. If you care for your community and your city if you know people invovled in the rioting turn them in, don’t complain about the politicians impoverishing our communities and cutting services if you’re prepared to tolerate and shelter the thugs currently burning down our neighbourhoods.

Hopefully this will calm down soon and we can take a long hard think about how on earth we’ve got to this state, and I will laugh at the first person who tries to blame it on poverty. I will also point and laugh at anyone making lazy comparisons between the current bunch of wets we have in charge and Thatcher and saying it was due to the cuts (we’re spending more than ever) and that it’s just like the 80′s.

Meanwhile I hope everyone stays safe and good luck to everyone in the Police and Fire brigade currently trying to keep the place safe, and hope you get back to your families soon.

BTW there’s a facebook group for those that want an easy way to express support for the Met against the rioters

P.S. I wonder how many of the rioters fires will turn out to be insurance jobs as buildings “went on fire”

P.P.S Is this the summer of rage just running late due to the wrong kind of summer?

 

Yesterday I briefly mentioned that things aren’t so good across the pond, well today Captain Ranty brings news that it’s actually worse than that….

“On August 3rd, millions of Americans are expecting their social security payments. The govt need to shell out $23 billion but they only have $12 billion, leaving an $11 billion shortfall. One way around it all is to increase the debt ceiling. The USA is in the hole for an incredible $14.3 Trillion but they need more.”

Pop over to the Captains for the full story, but you might want to get a strong cup of tea first.

 

In other news there is in fact other news than the shocking revelations that journalists use dodgy methods, some police will sell journalists information for a wodge or cash or a few pints and politicians will suck up to anyone that might give them a gnats fart of a whiff of power and aren’t to be trusted. As others have observed very little of this is new or really surprising – and really how much would anyone care if it had just been confined to celebs and politicians?

But yes other news, amazingly other stuff has still been happening. Mainly that the European economy is continuing to do rather badly with Italy looking like they may soon have credit problems. Meanwhile despite actual opposition our Government has decided that in this time of austerity we should be chucking another 9 billion to the IMF – to lend to countries that can’t afford to pay back their existing debts (Captain Ranty has the list of those that voted to give away our money). These problems are apparently causing the great and good to talk about doubling the Euro bailout fund (H/T Traumaville gazette) though where that money will come from… And then just to help really put the boot in whilst asking councils to save money the Government is now planning the EU fine them under the new Localism Bill – Yep a localism bill that puts more power in the hands of the EU. Surprisingly all of this may be making the EU unpopular. Meanwhile at home despite all that stimulus the economy is still flat lining, maybe it’s time to encourage business. Things aren’t looking that much better across the pond where government spending is increasing an order of magnitude faster than median income. But no worries look at those naughty journalists.

Finally for all those crying out to defenestrate Cameron (an idea I’m not adverse to) who would you replace him with? As Old Holborn observes News International seems to have collapsed in a fortnight, we could do the same with our politicians (if they don’t do it to themselves) but then what?

Meanwhile it may be time I started reading CityAM.

 

Magna Carta of 1215Today is the 796th anniversary of the first great charter – the magna carta of 1215. Now some people think that it’s pretty much a busted flush these days, having been all but entirely repealed. Others seem to think that it’s irrelevant because we’re now a parliamentary democracy though the evidence suggests that despite them changing our passports to say “citizen” rather than “subject”* we are still actually a constitutional monarchy. Just because parliament acts like it’s supreme (and sadly the monarchy lets it) doesn’t make it so, just as just because parliament would like us to think they can repeal the very charter that created them doesn’t make it so. Though of course in our day to day lives we are in the position of the scrawny kid arguing with the school bully about how they can’t just make up the rules “because they say” – we may be right but our nose is still going to get bloodied and our lunch money stolen.

On the counter argument it’s worth noticing that even the corrupt troughers have of late appealed to Magna Carta and they weren’t told to go away because it’s all been repealed, instead the courts said it didn’t offer them the protection they hoped for. Surely if it was all nicely repealed as people would have us believe the courts would have just said so:
“Sorry old chap, that’s just not the law any more”
That they didn’t do so in such a public case is very telling, and it’s not just in that case other cases keep cropping up suggesting that the Magna Carta is alive and well. If as the evidence suggests we are in fact still a constitutional monarchy and that parliament can’t actually repeal charters and treaties that pre-date it – much as they’d like to or failing that have us believe they can. Then several things follow from that one of the more interesting being that Captain Ranty and his fellow travellers in lawful rebellion are in fact in the right.

This doesn’t mean that they won’t get a bloody nose, or that the state won’t trample all over them if they feel so inclined. But it does mean that they are right, and it’s always worth fighting for what’s right. It may not achieve much and it may mean travelling with a bunch of people that currently sometimes come across as well a bunch of loons, but then again not so long ago talking about global elites got you an instant tin-foil-hat and that’s changing. So joining the lawful rebels in being right may not achieve much, it needs to be done carefully as it will likely flag you up as a trouble maker, and thus asking for a bloody nose – but it does look like it’s the right thing to do. Just don’t be surprised when a corrupt government with scant concern for tradition or the rule of law ignores the rule of law when it tells you that your ancient rights won’t protect you. That though surely is all the more reason to fight for them. You may just be a gnat irritating the giant, but enough gnats can make that giant uncomfortable and get it to move and if there’s enough of them they’re damned difficult to swat. I’ll be getting my paper work in order shortly, just two letters left to send.

* I’m actually really quite annoyed about this.

 

I do apologise to wander once more onto geekier topics, but largely un-noticed today is World IPv6 Day. Which was hoping to make people more aware of IPv6 and the need to get ready for it – I’m not sure how well it’s done outside of people who already knew about it. Outside of the techy press the Gaurdian picked up on it and apparently Ed Vaizey said something about it. Despite it being a very low key event this is something you need to care about, as it will actually be terribly important. So get a cup of tea whilst I give a brief bit of back ground before I tell you why it matters.

So IPv6 is the 6th version of the Internet Protocol, currently the entire internet is running on version 4 (we don’t talk about version 5). The problem with IPv4 (or today’s internet) is that it was designed when people thought 640k was more memory than you’d ever need and that there was probably only the need for a half dozen super computers in the entire world. Fortunately for us, they were wrong and things have moved on a lot since then. Unfortunately the current system can’t cope with all those smart phones, smart TV’s, tablets and other internet connected dohickeys. So things are getting more crowded and people and web sites are having to share ever fewer addresses – this is a bad thing ™. To solve this enter IPv6 stage left – with vastly more space. Of course to handle this larger space requires larger addresses and well all the bits of clever computers that tie the internet together really weren’t built to handle that, so it all needs upgrading. This is neither cheap nor painless, so everyone has been waiting for everyone else to do something first and kind of hoping to retire before it became an actual problem.

Ok that’s the back ground over with, you can wake up again now – maybe go for a quick walk. Then I’ll continue as to why it matters.

Well for starters the Internet won’t grind to a sickening halt (not for a while) as we can all make better use of the space and share addresses and all that manner of clever stuff. This however is a bad thing(tm), mainly at least, as the more machines that share an address the less secure it all gets, and eventually the slower. Also to manage all that sharing the clever bits of kit run by your ISP and in places the government will have to pay more attention to who’s talking to what and maybe what they’re saying. Personally I’d rather the fewer people looking at my traffic the better. Of course the flip side is it’s also harder for them to prove who did what due to all the shared addresses (in much the same way pinning down who threw a cigarette butt out of a coach window is trickier than pining down who threw it out of a chauffeur driven limo). So as IPv4 runs out it will get harder for individuals to run their own servers, and we’ll be gradually squeezed into the equivalent of high rise tower blocks .

So that’s the bad, but moving to IPv6 has a lot of good especially for those of us that quite like to be able to communicate with each other without too much hindrance from the powers that be. Do you recall I said that the new system gave us more space – well I meant it a lot more space. No more than that much more than that. In todays world ISP’s charge you for a static IP and then charge more if you want a whole 5 IP addresses, in the new world the smallest number of addresses you can have is 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 (18 quintillion). Yes at home you’ll have enough address space to address all of your cornflakes and more. Now the downside of us all having nice (probably stable) public addresses, is that it’s easier to see who we’re talking to but due to inbuilt security it’s much much harder to see what we’re saying or interfere with it.

The really really interesting bit though is if we’re all on public addresses we can talk securely directly to each other, with no middleman (if we want to). If you want to set up a web server for you radical free hamsters on the land group no problems give it a public address you’ve still another 18,446,744,073,709,551,615 to play with. Given this is such an obvious use along with direct person-to-person networking you can be pretty sure that people will produce tools to make this as easy as calling a phone. In fact people are already working on it with things such as the freedom box aimed at letting you take back control of your social networking, your email and where you blog. You can run all of your email on a plug computer that costs less than 100 pounds (and the price is dropping), allowing you to exchange email securely directly with someone with a similar set up, without leaving any logs (subject to intercept laws) on your ISP’s mail servers. Keep it all on a small solid state disk and if you need to you can walk away with it all or destroy it. Plus of course no data mining of your email to improve the customer experience.

The thing is you don’t need to wait to be offered this, you can start playing with it today for free, using providers such as gogo6, Hurrican Electric or Sixxs. So whilst our great and good are making speeches, we can be building new infrastructure and ways of using it so they’ll be playing catch up so hard their on going attempts to limit what we say, how we say it and who we say it to, will make old Canute’s efforts look viable. Of course we’re still mainly stuck using centralised infrastructure, but there are ways round that as well if we feel like it.

So hopefully if you’re still with me, some of that has made sense. Go find a friendly geek if you need to and get onto the next generation of the internet whilst those that would control it are still talking about how to make it happen.

See you in the future – or maybe the past

© 2011 Anonymong Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha