<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Anonymong &#187; photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anonymong.org/tag/photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anonymong.org</link>
	<description>Blind in one ear and deaf in one eye</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:52:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Photographing buses</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2012/02/03/photographing-buses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2012/02/03/photographing-buses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=2230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2012/02/03/photographing-buses/"></g:plusone></div>
I was recently linked to an article that seemed to be bad news for photographers (sorry I forget who by), which I reposted on Facebook. I would have left it there, but for one of the comments I got which observed that the judgement was based on not the similarity of the pictures but on <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2012/02/03/photographing-buses/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2012/02/03/photographing-buses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Riot for the media</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/11/12/riot-for-the-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/11/12/riot-for-the-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 18:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stupidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summer of rage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=1229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/11/12/riot-for-the-media/"></g:plusone></div>
So the students have taken to the streets to protest at the proposed changes to student funding. On the plus side they start out with some very nice placards clearly stating their cause, then left a load of grafitti which didn&#8217;t mention it. The rather pointless riot somewhat spoilt it though, starting initially in the <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/11/12/riot-for-the-media/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/11/12/riot-for-the-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sneaky sneaky very sneaky</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/10/17/sneaky-sneaky-very-sneaky/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/10/17/sneaky-sneaky-very-sneaky/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=1189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/10/17/sneaky-sneaky-very-sneaky/"></g:plusone></div>
The Evening standard article about the secret ring of steel rather shocked me, though sadly didn&#8217;t surprise me as much as it once would have. Very quietly rounds around the city have been being blocked, changed from public highways to private property with private security and controls on what people on those streets can and <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/10/17/sneaky-sneaky-very-sneaky/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/10/17/sneaky-sneaky-very-sneaky/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You can&#8217;t trust a copper</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/27/you-cant-trust-a-copper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/27/you-cant-trust-a-copper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=1086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/27/you-cant-trust-a-copper/"></g:plusone></div>
It&#8217;s true it seems you can&#8217;t trust a copper to actually know the law they&#8217;re meant to be enforcing. The Metropolitan police commissioner has admitted that his police sometimes forget the law on photography (not that it&#8217;s been a high profile issue or anything), and of course the plastic police have been found to delete <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/27/you-cant-trust-a-copper/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/27/you-cant-trust-a-copper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>They really don&#8217;t like photographers do they</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/31/they-really-dont-like-photographers-do-they/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/31/they-really-dont-like-photographers-do-they/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital economy bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/31/they-really-dont-like-photographers-do-they/"></g:plusone></div>
The original of this article is over on Copyright Action, but they seem to be having bandwidth issues so I reproduce it in it&#8217;s entirety here. (reproduced with permission and all copyright and content remains © Copyright Action 2008 &#8211; 2009). When you&#8217;ve finished reading this consider a few things: 1) The police are generally <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/31/they-really-dont-like-photographers-do-they/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/31/they-really-dont-like-photographers-do-they/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Economy Bill &#8211; Petiton Harriet</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/24/digital-economy-bill-petiton-harriet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/24/digital-economy-bill-petiton-harriet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital economy bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/24/digital-economy-bill-petiton-harriet/"></g:plusone></div>
Currently the Digital economy bill, is still trundling it&#8217;s way through parliament without any proper debate or anyone much taking a look at it. On Thursday Harriet Harman will have to explain the Government&#8217;s plans for this bill so before then write to her and ask that it be given proper time for a full <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/24/digital-economy-bill-petiton-harriet/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/24/digital-economy-bill-petiton-harriet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not a terrorist? &#8211; doesn&#8217;t matter</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/02/22/not-a-terrorist-doesnt-matter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/02/22/not-a-terrorist-doesnt-matter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2010/02/22/not-a-terrorist-doesnt-matter/"></g:plusone></div>
Via Old Holborn on Facebook and already picked up on by LegIron and Obnoxio it seems that the plastic plod still haven&#8217;t got the message about not harassing photographers. Taking photographs of Christmas festivities in that well known security hotspot of Accrington is &#8220;Suspicious&#8221; behaviour and if you don&#8217;t &#8220;volunteer&#8221; your details when stopped under <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/02/22/not-a-terrorist-doesnt-matter/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/02/22/not-a-terrorist-doesnt-matter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photography in public places the battle continues</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/12/28/photography-in-public-places-the-battle-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/12/28/photography-in-public-places-the-battle-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 00:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="http://www.anonymong.org/2009/12/28/photography-in-public-places-the-battle-continues/"></g:plusone></div>
You can tell that the problem with the police harassing photographers for taking pictures in public places is getting serious when 365 establishment photographer write a letter to the Telegraph (hat tip Samizdata). If things get much worse they&#8217;ll write to the editor of the Times and use green ink. Now I&#8217;m not convinced this <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2009/12/28/photography-in-public-places-the-battle-continues/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/12/28/photography-in-public-places-the-battle-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

