<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Anonymong &#187; photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anonymong.org/tag/photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anonymong.org</link>
	<description>Blind in one ear and deaf in one eye</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:18:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>You can&#8217;t trust a copper</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/27/you-cant-trust-a-copper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/27/you-cant-trust-a-copper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=1086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s true it seems you can&#8217;t trust a copper to actually know the law they&#8217;re meant to be enforcing. The Metropolitan police commissioner has admitted that his police sometimes forget the law on photography (not that it&#8217;s been a high profile issue or anything), and of course the plastic police have been found to delete <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/27/you-cant-trust-a-copper/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/07/27/you-cant-trust-a-copper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>They really don&#8217;t like photographers do they</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/31/they-really-dont-like-photographers-do-they/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/31/they-really-dont-like-photographers-do-they/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital economy bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The original of this article is over on Copyright Action, but they seem to be having bandwidth issues so I reproduce it in it&#8217;s entirety here. (reproduced with permission and all copyright and content remains © Copyright Action 2008 &#8211; 2009). When you&#8217;ve finished reading this consider a few things: 1) The police are generally <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/31/they-really-dont-like-photographers-do-they/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/31/they-really-dont-like-photographers-do-they/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Economy Bill &#8211; Petiton Harriet</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/24/digital-economy-bill-petiton-harriet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/24/digital-economy-bill-petiton-harriet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital economy bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Currently the Digital economy bill, is still trundling it&#8217;s way through parliament without any proper debate or anyone much taking a look at it. On Thursday Harriet Harman will have to explain the Government&#8217;s plans for this bill so before then write to her and ask that it be given proper time for a full <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/24/digital-economy-bill-petiton-harriet/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/24/digital-economy-bill-petiton-harriet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not a terrorist? &#8211; doesn&#8217;t matter</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/02/22/not-a-terrorist-doesnt-matter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/02/22/not-a-terrorist-doesnt-matter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via Old Holborn on Facebook and already picked up on by LegIron and Obnoxio it seems that the plastic plod still haven&#8217;t got the message about not harassing photographers. Taking photographs of Christmas festivities in that well known security hotspot of Accrington is &#8220;Suspicious&#8221; behaviour and if you don&#8217;t &#8220;volunteer&#8221; your details when stopped under <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/02/22/not-a-terrorist-doesnt-matter/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/02/22/not-a-terrorist-doesnt-matter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photography in public places the battle continues</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/12/28/photography-in-public-places-the-battle-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/12/28/photography-in-public-places-the-battle-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 00:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can tell that the problem with the police harassing photographers for taking pictures in public places is getting serious when 365 establishment photographer write a letter to the Telegraph (hat tip Samizdata). If things get much worse they&#8217;ll write to the editor of the Times and use green ink. Now I&#8217;m not convinced this <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2009/12/28/photography-in-public-places-the-battle-continues/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/12/28/photography-in-public-places-the-battle-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
