<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Anonymong &#187; politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anonymong.org/tag/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anonymong.org</link>
	<description>Blind in one ear and deaf in one eye</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:27:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The coalition of the purple</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/29/the-coalition-of-the-purple/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/29/the-coalition-of-the-purple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 18:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tin foil hat time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now as promised/threatened I&#8217;m afraid I&#8217;m returning to the matter of the &#8220;take back parliament&#8221; coalition. Firstly though a correction to my earlier post in that Mark Ross appears to have no connection to Ekklesia except they published a puff blog for Take Back Parliament, so sorry about that. Anyway onto looking at how they <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/29/the-coalition-of-the-purple/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/29/the-coalition-of-the-purple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How they are related</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/20/how-they-are-related/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/20/how-they-are-related/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 23:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Betrayal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tin foil hat time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So back to the purple brigade, and many many thanks to Woman on a Raft for supplying me with some of this information (see comments here and here). I was getting quite confused as to how all the main players were related so I put together a bit of a family tree to try to <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/20/how-they-are-related/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/05/20/how-they-are-related/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Labours real direction</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/27/labours-real-direction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/27/labours-real-direction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 15:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If there has ever been any doubt about the direction Labour and Gordon Brown in particular want to take this country, I think it&#8217;s safe to say that they have now let the cat out of the bag. &#8220;there is no rebellion against collectivism in the country (Tip of the tifter to Guido) So unless <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/27/labours-real-direction/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/27/labours-real-direction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>646 All Out!</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/19/646-all-out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/19/646-all-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plug]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those of you that aren&#8217;t reading this via RSS may have noticed a little logo that has appeared over on the right hand side. It&#8217;s a little campaign I&#8217;m trying to launch which I think might appeal to anyone that may happen to be reading here. I shall simply repeat here what I&#8217;ve said there <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/19/646-all-out/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/03/19/646-all-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You say Tobin they say Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/02/15/you-say-tobin-they-say-robin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/02/15/you-say-tobin-they-say-robin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NWO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So after the G20 decided that a Tobin tax was a bad idea it has risen zombie like at the behest of varies lovies lefties and media pundits under the new name of The Robin hood tax. Which is far more fun sounding, though one has to ignore that Robin Hood was if the legends <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/02/15/you-say-tobin-they-say-robin/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/02/15/you-say-tobin-they-say-robin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A worrying sort of sense</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/02/05/a-worrying-sort-of-sense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/02/05/a-worrying-sort-of-sense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Must read post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just read a rather disturbing article by Mr Hitchens of the Mail on Sunday (hat tip to The Salted Slug). Disturbing because it makes an awful lot of sense in suggesting that if we want rid of Labour and a real change in politics then the best thing could be if the Tory&#8217;s lose and <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/02/05/a-worrying-sort-of-sense/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/02/05/a-worrying-sort-of-sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>e-petitions what are they good for?</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/01/26/e-petitions-what-are-they-good-for/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/01/26/e-petitions-what-are-they-good-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I received notification that the Government had responded to an e-petition I&#8217;d signed. It happened to be the one regarding their limiting cost recovery if you&#8217;re found innocent (response here). Now other than suspecting they&#8217;ll not limit the costs they can award if you&#8217;re found guilty, and wondering why they now just send a <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/01/26/e-petitions-what-are-they-good-for/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/01/26/e-petitions-what-are-they-good-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UKIP a correction</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/01/17/ukip-a-correction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/01/17/ukip-a-correction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 13:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[errata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really must apologise, my previous article UKIP losing the plot I&#8217;d rather presumed that UKIP wanted a blanket ban on the burqa. However as Dick Puddlecote points out over at Old Holborns this isn&#8217;t actually the case. They just want to ban it in public buildings and allow for it to be banned in <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/01/17/ukip-a-correction/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/01/17/ukip-a-correction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another must read post</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/01/07/another-must-read-post/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/01/07/another-must-read-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 19:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Must read post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The leader of the UK Libertarian party has posted a rather good polemic over at The Devils Kitchen however don&#8217;t read it there, go and read the copy up at Captain Ranty as his introduction is rather fantastic. In summary though as has been observed in many places and times before, soon we get to <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2010/01/07/another-must-read-post/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2010/01/07/another-must-read-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carter-fuck at it again</title>
		<link>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/10/16/carter-fuck-at-it-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/10/16/carter-fuck-at-it-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Giolla</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sparticus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carter-Fuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trafigura]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonymong.org/?p=515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So like a dose of the clap Carter-fuck are back at it again ( hat tip to Anna Raccoon). They seem to have realised that trying to stop the press reporting on Parliament is a bad move from a publicity point of view, so&#8230; now they&#8217;re trying to stop Parliament discussing the report about their <a href='http://www.anonymong.org/2009/10/16/carter-fuck-at-it-again/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anonymong.org/2009/10/16/carter-fuck-at-it-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
