So having avoided the computer quite well for the last four days I thought I’d just pop back briefly to hope you all had a wonderful time, doing what ever it is people do these days. Also as I have a penchant for obscure and forgotten holy days/festivals I would observes that today is the feat of the Holy Innocents, in honour of which was written what I think is one of the most beautiful English hymns (not strictly a carol). So hear for you delectation is the Westminster Cathedral Choir singing the Coventry Carol. Enjoy – normal lack of service will resume shortly.

 

Whilst I’m on the subject of the power of symbols a while back Captain Ranty reported that it’s now terribly naughty according to the EU to use the “Keep Calm and carry on” image that the Government created back in 1939 as:
The EU has granted an EU Community Trade Mark to ‘KEEP CALM AND CARRY ON’ meaning that only one company may use the slogan for clothing, mugs, posters and other memorabilia.

Of course it’s quite possible our own trademark officials would have been just as stupid, in which case I’d no doubt be suggesting ignoring them and protesting about their actions. In more recent news of course some excitable chaps got excited at a French magazine putting a cartoon on their cover and fire bombed the offices of said magazine to register their distaste of this image:

100 lashes if you don't die of laughter!  Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/charlie-hebdo-mohammed-2011-11#ixzz1d8xQPkcA

Rather reassuringly various other publishers helped them out by giving them office space whilst their now burnt out offices were dealt with, and to show that there were no hard feelings about the incident Charlie Hebdo are now running with this cover (H/T Katabasis):
Love is stronger than hate

Which seems a terribly polite response to people that like to burn both buildings and poppies.

 

Something that is rather puzzling me at the moment is the seemingly normal unevenness in the application of “law” and the acceptability of protest. I know it’s not really that surprising, and isn’t news but a few things have crossed my vision in the last week which do seem to suggest that we (in a collective national sense) have rather lost the plot. Most recently Orphans of Liberty report that a council has refused to give the EDL permission to lay a wreath at a memorial, and rightly asks the question since when did you need the councils permission to lay a wreath? Meanwhile Harry’s place reports that “hope not hate” are trying to get an EDL march banned in Tower Hamlets, that well known bastion of moderate Islam. Hope not hate, having been remarkably silent about the recent stickering of that area with Islamic anti-gay stickers. The comments on Harry’s place are well worth reading to see a decent fsking of both the petition and hope not hate’s general attitude. Including the well observed comment that EDL are filling a vacuum left by no one directly addressing the problem of militant Islam. Whilst the EDL may not be the solution so far no one has offered anything better.

Yet there seems to have been far less said about the alleged plans of “Muslims Against the Crusades” to set up Sharia zones reportedly to begin in Waltham Forest. Is this because it’s all just so much hot air coming from the Islamic quarter, has anyone seen the stickers supposedly put up in Walthamstow? It’ll be interesting to discover if a quiet attempt at the creation of areas hostile to those that Islam doesn’t approve of, if not full blown Sharia areas, is actually going on? Has their march taken place yet? if it hasn’t perhaps we’ll see the like of hope not hate calling for such marches to be banned any day now.

 

census 2011 Mind Your Own Since I last muttered about Archbishops Cranmers campaign to tell the census takers to “Mind their own business” , he’s been asked quite a few questions about the census generally and his campaign which he answers here. The main point of which is really that if we don’t start telling them “no” at some point then they’ll never stop, or as he puts it:
“it is about protesting a limit to the intrusion of the database state. Only by telling the Government to MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS can that protest be made. Leaving the question blank is passive assent to being asked. “

As Long Rider observes when in opposition the Conservatives thought the Census too obtrusive but now they’re in power it’d cost too much to change anything (How it’d cost more to just cancel the thing is unclear). I think I may have to invest in a strategically leaky pen to make my legally required responses as useful as possible. Fuel injected Moose has the census and some suggestions of their own.

Update Almost forgot to mention that the Government is aware that people might not like the Census so have set up a special department to handle negative comments in the mainstream media and “social media” Spyblog has details. They also remind me that all of the census data processing will be done in the US by military contractor Lockheed Martin, who are obliged to let the US government look at the raw census data if they want to.

 

census 2011 Mind Your Own

Whilst we’re on the subject of religion, I notice that His Grace Archbishop Cranmer has just launched a campaign to tell the state to mind it’s own business when it inquires as to what particular religious belief we may or may not observe. Now never being one to miss a passing band wagon and being keen on the state paying far less interest in what we might be doing as long as we’re not causing harm*. So as such I’m quite happy to plug His Graves “mind your own” campaign and hope that many other follow suit.
As he so rightly points out:
“Until the sate defines religion, it is not possible to tick ‘No religion’.”
So as we don’t know what they’re asking and as it seems the won’t be recognizing the force telling them to mind their own business seems a perfectly sensible reply.

There is of course the obligatory Facebook group

 

This post has been stumbling around my head for a while now, like a drunk goth trying to find their way out of an unfamiliar club – but thanks to a couple of posts from Captain Ranty (one of which has been removed but I saw by the wonders of RSS and the other of which is here) my thoughts seem to have stumbled in a rather dazed fashion into a semblance of coherence. I’m afraid this article is going to be about religion and worse than that Catholicism and the Pope – and if that wasn’t bad enough I’m not even going to bash them that much. So now you’ve been duly warned I’ll not be at all offended if you skip this, and my normal ramblings will resume in due course.

Continue reading »

 

A friend brought this article over at the Wall street journal to my attention, it seems that a German Islamic scholar,Muhammad Sven Kalisch, has suggested that perhaps the prophet Muhammad never existed

Unfortunately the article doesn’t go into much detail about his thinking, but there is of course a forth coming book, what I find interesting so far and will I suspect prove even more interesting when the book comes out is peoples reactions to this idea. As the professor says questioning the existence of Jesus and the historical accuracy of religious books is a well established tradition except in the case of Islam. Again as the Professor notes and other religions prove the historical existence of any given spiritual leader really isn’t so important as their message. I somehow suspect though that some adherents of the religion of peace may not be quite so sanguine about Islam being subject tot he same debate and study as the other world religions. There haven’t been any death threats yet though so that’s progress.

I do find it amusing that one of the counter arguments put forward by another Scholar with a book to sell, Tilman Nagel, is that the prophet must exist as “it is quite astonishing to say that thousands and thousands of pages about him were all forged”. I can but assume that Mr Nagel is therefore equally happy about the existence of Santa Claws, the Tooth Fairy and monsters under your bed, all of which also have thousands and thousands of pages about them.

Anyway interesting times ahead for Mr Kalisch.

 

Catching up on that afore mentioned reading of blogs, the dauntless LegIron has commented on Bin rage which is currently a minor grumble of mine with currently no obvious solution. Where I live my non-recyling is taken away fortnightly which is usually fine I don’t normally have more than a shopping back of rubbish a week to throw out, so I have a small wheely bin, all well and good. Except every now and then I have a sort out, such as when my housemate/lodger moves out and suddenly my bin is full to over flowing. Now back in the day this wasn’t a problem you just filled a few more council bin bags and put them out for collection, but no the sticker on my bin says no “side waste” and the lid must close. There’s a recycling depot just 10 minutes away which is no use as none of this is recycling material, I don’t drive so the dump’s not an option. So either I pay the council about 35 quid to turn up with a garden clearance van for a few bags of rubbish, or I get to store my trash for a number of weeks or months filling up my bin each fortnight once the more fly friendly trash is in there … or I could investigate fly tipping and then report that to the council get them to take it away for free and maybe if I’m lucky get a reward or something. I know which option is more appealing.

Now onto the question, the news which I accidentally watched has alerted me to the fact that there have been terrible floods in Pakistan and that this humanitarian disaster requires the west to dig deep into it’s pockets and give large amounts of aid from money it doesn’t have. All very normal but what I’m wondering about is the pakistani officials/spokes people and the like talking about “avoidable loss of life”.
Pakistan is officially the “Islamic Republic of Pakistan”, and last I checked Islam believes in predestination, when it’s your time to go it’s your time to go and no matter what you do you can’t avoid it. Therefore surely none of that lose of life is avoidable and it’s an affront to Allah for us to try to prevent these people from dying? I suppose the argument is that we should give succour to the living who aren’t on the days list to die to make them more comfortable, all well and good – but “avoidable loss of life”?

 

Now normally I really can’t draw, tonight I’m just back from the pub and my graphics tablet isn’t working so I had to use the trackball. Trackballs it seems are even worse for drawing than mice. However this is as good as it’ll get so for the First Annual Everybody Draw Mohammad Day – here’s something….
Mohamchad

Update A rather good article about why to draw Mohammad over at Greta Christina’s Blog and the Everyone Draw Mohammed blog

© 2011 Anonymong Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha