Due to having had a bit of social life this weekend I’m a tad behind with the obligatory comment on the September 11 anniversary – but as it’s apparently compulsory I can’t let the date pass uncommented. On the bright side it also means I can largely just link to other people that have said what I want to say so much better than I would. Let’s start the ball rolling with Penn and Teller (H/T Angry Exile)

From how we’ve reacted to that one incident and the subsequent nonsense in London – has basically meant that from the get go we’ve lost. We’ve allowed ourselves to be terrorised, and in defending our culture of freedom our politicians have destroyed it, and our media have taught us to be afraid. In the UK after attacks less successful than anything the IRA ever did. We’ve introduced draconian laws and sacrificed numerous liberties to save ourselves from a lesser than risk than being hit by a car. As the wired article says some people suggest that looking at the risk that way doesn’t account for the impact it has on society. However again as the wired article observes the terrorist doesn’t get to change our laws, our politicians do.


Former White House counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke has an answer. “There’s going to be a terrorist strike some day,” Clarke told Frontline for its “Top Secret America” documentary this week. “And when there is, if you’ve reduced the terrorism budget, the other party, whoever the other party is at the time, is going to say that you were responsible for the terrorist strike because you cut back the budget. And so it’s a very, very risky thing to do.”

The risk, in other words, is a political risk. The culture of fear: It’s a bipartisan race to the bottom. And it’s why the National Security State constructed by the George W. Bush administration has found a diligent steward in President Obama. Asked recently if the post-9/11 security apparatus might diminish soon now that al-Qaida looks weak, Janet Napolitano, the secretary of homeland security, replied, “No.”

And it’s not much different over here, no matter how low the risk the politicians have to be seen to be doing something for fear other politicians will use the next attack no matter how pathetic it is as a stick to beat them. Even if you accept that the “war on terror” is needed to counter real and serious terrorist threats, well I’m afraid that the politicians and the media would have us be scared of the wrong terrorists. Out of the 249 terrorists attacks in Europe in 2010 three of them were carried out by Islamists. That’s it three whole attacks, and of the people arrested for planning terrorist attacks 53% weren’t related to Islamist attacks*

So it would seem to me that we’re letting our politicians waste huge amounts of money, destroy our liberties and enact draconian laws to combat the wrong threat. Whilst our media scares us with an ineffectual bogeyman whilst not mentioning people that seem to be doing a better job of blowing other people up. Surely the best way to remember and honour those that died in the attacks in New York and elsewhere would be to take the same approach as we took with the IRA – carry on as usual and don’t destroy our own culture for fear the bogey man might get us?

* Yes I know I swapped which way I quoted the stats, also just using Islamist as that’s what the data i’m referencing used.

 

Quite a while back I bemoaned the fact that MI5 weren’t kind enough to provide an RSS feed of the current UK threat level so I wrote a little script so I could know in real time if I should be more or less afraid, and so make sure that my fear and paranoia were at government approved levels at all times.

Well it seems that they’ve finally* got round to providing an official RSS feed which is very nice of them and far more reliable than my efforts. You can find it here:
https://www.mi5.gov.uk/output/threat-level-rss.html

Note it’s available over both HTTP and HTTPS so you can be sure that no one will be snooping to find out how afraid the government thinks you should be.

I’ve added the official feed to this blog as well as my home grown version – just in case the two ever diverge.

Just as a matter of interest the threat level hasn’t been less than substantial since August 2006 when they started telling us what was going on.

* To be fair they may have done it ages ago I’ve not been paying that much attention.

 

Whilst the TSA “Scan or be groped” problem is currently restricted to the US, I’ve stumbled across enough articles discussing the matter of late that it seemed worth having a bit of a round up. If only because I know enough people that fly out there regularly and just as likely either the US will demand we have similar procedures (there being no point in having such procedures if people can avoid them simply by flying into the country) or we’ll copy them anyway. Over at Samizdata there’s a decent bit of discussion on if the searches are reasonable and changes in attitudes. American commentary suggests that the TSA procedures are the real way to provoke a revolution and observe at the impact of a single failed bomb attempt:

Is that not amazing, by the way? That a solitary “Christmas underwear bomber” has now changed the complexion of the entire country and inconvenienced tens of millions with a single failed attempt? Yes, all this groping is because of one guy, and he’s not even Justin Bieber. How incredible is that? Who says an individual can’t make a difference? Who says the terrorists haven’t already won?

Over at Big Brother Watch there are reports of people resisting being searched and links to a mass opt-out of being scanned planned for yesterday – I haven’t been able to find any reports yet of how well that went. Individuals are also recording their own attempts to highlight the problem by trying to be nearest-to-naked a passenger has gotten at a TSA screening (NSFW – but contains some ace ideas for making the people searching you uncomfortable).

Of course all the official talk about this being to protect our safety it seems doesn’t seem to stand up well to scrutiny with some economists suggesting that if avoiding the TSA causes people to drive instead the death toll will increase – road travel being mile for mile still more dangerous than air travel. Then there’s the question of the safety of those scanners which may not actually be anywhere as near as safe as the TSA like to claim – especially for children and those with genetic risk factors.

But perhaps as others have suggested the whole point of this exercise is so that when they back off a bit we’ll all be terribly grateful that we “only” have to carry travel permits, and present our papers on demand.

Update: My attention has been drawn to an article looking at where the TSA might go next after all planes aren’t the only way to travel

 

Probably old news to loads of you, but just got linked to this, Ron Paul making some excellent points about airport/aircraft security and relying on the Government to protect us generally.

The comparative fatality rates given are quite striking. If you’ve not seen it it’s just 5 minutes so enjoy.

 

The Evening standard article about the secret ring of steel rather shocked me, though sadly didn’t surprise me as much as it once would have. Very quietly rounds around the city have been being blocked, changed from public highways to private property with private security and controls on what people on those streets can and can’t do. Two thirds of the roads into the city have been closed leaving just 19 ways to drive in all of which are monitored by CCTV camera’s recording car number plates and the occupants.

Whilst the city has always been different and a bit of a city state, this very quiet change to the urban infrastructure represents a massive retrograde step to when the city was an actual walled city. Given how quietly they’ve achieved it round the city, I’m sure they’ll manage to do the same sort of thing elsewhere with just as little uproar.

I sadly can’t make the exhibition mentioned in the article or go on the walk, but I think I have a new project a modern day beating of the bounds, just repeating the work done by Henrietta Williams and George Gingell for myself mapping the ring and photographing what I can.

The exhibition part of This is not a gateway runs from the 22nd to the 24th Oct at HANBURY HALL, 22 HANBURY STREET, E1 6QR

The full details of the exhibit on the ring of steel are as follows:

Henrietta Williams, George Gingell: Ring of Steel: Entering the Panopticon The so-called ‘Ring of Steel’ is a security installation that carefully guards the City of London. Ushering in a new phase of fortress urbanism the ‘Ring of Steel’ creates a digitally hermetically sealed security installation. A system of CCTV, narrowed streets, sentry boxes and bollards preventing access is used to carefully monitor the square mile. Through maps and photographs this project aims to make visible the function, nature and effect of the Ring of Steel, its role as a Panopticon, demonstrating how it follows an ancient line of city defense whilst generating a very 21st century approach to control. Rosa Luxemburg Hall

 

Leg Iron has for a long time been talking about how the methods use to attack smokers are applied to drinkers, over weight people and everyone else really, especially high lighting the potential affects of all this reduce salt, reduce fat ban this that and the other plans on the mental well being of anyone actually forced to comply with them. Today the Devils Knife brings news that Japan has moved beyond just encouraging people to be more healthy but are now fining companies if their employee’s don’t match a government defined waist line (seemingly irrespective of any other considerations).

Meanwhile the World Cancer Research Fund has declared that all processed meat is unfit for human consumption. Apparently we should all stop eating bacon, sausages, slamai everything as it’s so carcinogenic that people must be falling down dead in the streets like the plot of some low budget horror movie. The compulsory scare number is a 67% increase in the risk of pancreatic cancer – compared to people that ate little or no meat at all. So whilst apparently the average risk is that 1 in 76 people will get pancreatic cancer I am inclined to add this to the long list of things they want to control and note that the message associated with it is “don’t eat any processed meat”. This will of course increase the cost of eating meat for most people, and so ties into the seemingly global push towards vegetarianism that seems to beloved of the green movement. When they’re not advocating blowing people up for not doing enough to bring about global cooling.

 

In a shock statement the head of MI5 would like more money, or at least not to have to make cuts, and if they could please continue to lock up anyone they thing is a wrong ‘un then that would be just dandy. In the meantime they’ll continue to work very hard blocking all sorts of threats they can’t tell us about, and the increasing number of attacks they expect to see from the bog trotters, Somali’s and other third world nations.

Full article here and remember just because someone isn’t breaking criminal law it’s no reason not to lock them up anyway.

 

This post is going to link to quite a few old articles as every time I’m about to write it something new adds to the pile of stuff that needs to be included. So it’s time I accepted the pace of things happening is just too fast and I should try to tie a few bits together knowing it’s all going to be out of date before I hit publish.

The Government has a love hate relationship with the Internet, it loves the amount of data and control it could give over us but hates the fact that it allows people to talk to each other and exchange ideas. As such they have to pursue a multi-pronged approach to the Internet, make sure that everyone is connected and then make sure they control what we do and see. It sounds fanciful I’ll admit but sadly it does rather add up.

Consider that the Government wants as many people on line as possible which makes sense as they also want us all to have our very own personalised website for dealing with the government (H/T Old Holborn) – perhaps with links to online terrorist reporting or other such important civic tools. If you’ve not got a computer they’ll buy a laptop for you, which will probably have webcams which if activities in the US are anything to go by, which will be used to monitor you for “improper behaviour”. Perhaps as is already happening with CCTV cameras operators monitoring your behaviour will issue a warning. Of course I’d fully expect these personal websites to feed into CRB checks, and for security purposes you’ll no doubt (after a few suitable scares) need an ID card to login.

To make things even more like ” 1984″ housing estates are being built with their own Broadcasting channels and giant TV screens, to go with all those screens being installed in schools and doctors surgeries (along with yet more CCTV cameras), showing government information films.

The other main prong as mentioned is control, well:

Falling back to using old fashioned post to communicate and thus avoiding the internet won’t I’m afraid help.

Meanwhile out in the real world we’re already being made to walk through check points when wandering around our cities during police “lock downs”. To put aside any concerns over exaggeration as to how bad things have got even the Information Commissioners Office are saying “that we are in fact waking up to a surveillance society that is already all around us.”. Just to make that surveillance easier the Government is working on tracking us via our mobile phones, even with out that it’s already very difficult to disappear.

All in all it does rather add up to a quite unpleasant state of affairs

 

Not quite the thought police but step by step we’re getting there. The Portsmouth News (Via The Register) is reporting a musician who was taken off a train to explain a song list he was writing which was read over his shoulder by (presumably actual) transport police.

Though at least this time they didn’t use the terrorism excuse but instead it was because there had “been a ‘number of arrests’ nearby including one man who had killed his wife.“. It’s probably just as well he wasn’t in a folk group, anyone singing traditional ditties staggering home tonight had best be careful.

On the bright side at least he didn’t have a camera with him, then he’d have been in real trouble.

 

Via Old Holborn on Facebook and already picked up on by LegIron and Obnoxio it seems that the plastic plod still haven’t got the message about not harassing photographers. Taking photographs of Christmas festivities in that well known security hotspot of Accrington is “Suspicious” behaviour and if you don’t “volunteer” your details when stopped under Section 44 they’ll just get you arrested for anti-social behaviour instead.

Given how many public statements there have been concerning both the police and the plastics abusing their powers in this way, and despite the repeated reminders that “no laws prevent people from photographing buildings” the message just isn’t getting across. It’s almost enough to make you start to wonder if the public message we hear is actually the same one that is being given to the people in uniforms. Also Section 44 applies in designated areas only – so is a shopping centre in Accrington really a designated area or where they just making things up and is there an on-line list of all the designated areas anywhere?

© 2011 Anonymong Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha