Puritans don’t party

Olympic Rings Sorry to be talking about the Olympics again, I know it’s pretty much inescapable where ever you go so I’m sorry to be adding to that. Now certain bits of the international media have noticed that we’re exactly in a party mood. I’m sure by now you’ve all seen the numerous stories about what that august body LoCog have decided to ban to prevent any local business actually benefiting from the disruption of the Olympics, in case you’ve missed it here’s a selection.A volunteer produced village news paper for Boxhill has been banned from making and selling a special edition as the road race goes through their village – I don’t believe there’s an official newspaper of the Olympics so what sponsor this hurts who knows. We’re all of us banned from uploading any photo’s or videos of the Olympics anywhere:
In addition a ticket holder may not license, broadcast or publish video and/or sound recordings, including on social networking websites and the internet more generally.”
I would at this point note that the purely commercial and rather successful Tour De France which has recently finished seems to manage without these restrictions. The appears to be just the tip of an insane iceberg, in fact it’s so bad that the guy that wrote the rules for brand protection says his rules are being abused. Seb Coe has assured us that if we wear the wrong brand of clothing we probably won’t be made to remove it. Probably won’t, not a bet I’d care to make as security are already objecting to T-shirts with weapons on them, so I’m sure the 300 odd brand police won’t be far behind. In fact it seems as though at every turn they’re trying to alienate people from the games and that’s even ignoring the pre-emptive policing. James Higham ascribes it to the peculiar British propensity for sticking to the law, I don’t quite agree – the British aren’t that fixated on the law, it’s just the people who actually want the jobs of enforcing these rules are. It’s the oft mentioned battle between the Cavalier and Puritan factions of the country. The Cavaliers couldn’t even begin to imagine why anyone would be so dour and petty as to enforce the rules in such a way so rarely spot how they might be abused, after all it’s meant to be a party and everyone enjoying themselves. The Puritans on the other hand don’t really like parties and people having fun so are more than unhappy to enforce the very letter of the law. Lets face it there’s a party happening those more inclined to the Cavalier mindset aren’t going to be rushing to go round checking on logo usage or what trainers people are wearing, ah but those puritans they don’t want to party so they’re quite happy to check such things.

The Olympics are the tension between these two factions written large on the world stage:
Cavalier: “Lets host a party for the world!”
Puritan: “OK, but we must make sure it’s done properly with just a few little rules”
C: “Are you sure? Just a few rules?”
P: “Yes just a few to make sure there’s plenty of money for the party”
C: “Oh OK, I’ll let you get on with that then. Paaarrtyyy!”
P: “Excelllent”

Then those few rules become an insane list of banned objects that’s more restrictive than any other commercial sports event or even air travel and a set of regulations covering Words and logos so complex it needs two separate flow charts (pages 12 and 24). Those rules which most people wouldn’t even think of writing let alone applying then get enforced with vigour by the Puritans we repeatedly let run things, with so much vigour that they make damn sure that if there really must be a party no-one will enjoy it too much. Now if only our Government would embrace the other side of the Puritan mind set and be careful with money and abhor the spendthrift.

Update Andrew Gilligan provides a comprehensive list of Olympic closures

Losing the battle already

Olympic RingsI know I shouldn’t extrapolate from a few face book comments to tar an entire group with the same broad brush, but this recent post to the CAMRA group on face book convinces me that some people really aren’t paying attention. In fact they’re obviously paid so little attention that the battle to save booze from the same fate as has so far befell smoking has probably been lost already. How after all the bans we’ve already seen can anyone still ask “IS this advertising ban going too far” rather than “how do we stop this lunacy dead in it’s tracks”? More depressing none of the few comments say out right it’s insane or a bad thing, they just suggest other targets it should be applied to, “no take them, they’re much worse than we are”. The article being commented on is the usual MP’s considering banning alcohol advertising and considering putting bogus health warnings on alcohol, that everyone reading this I’m sure are familiar with. Just as well that the whole Tobacco controls being a slippery slope is a myth and it’s all pure coincidence that they want to apply all the same measures to alcohol, nope no slippery slope here, move along nothing to see.

In the face of such idiocy, I’m off to the pub.

Juxtaposition

Two unrelated posts drifted uncross my path recently and I thought I’d present them side by side for your delectation.

Firstly we have Head Rambles suggesting the quite erudite Grandads law (to stand alongside Godwin law)
“The first person to mention “the children” in an attempt to sway public opinion has lost their case.”

He goes on to argue quite reasonably that protecting Children against every imagined fear leave them quite ill equipped to deal with life and does them no favours at all.

The second article I’d like to present is quite a lot longer but very well worth reading. It comes from across the pond and concerns Bikers working to help children who have been victims of abuse or “Bikers Against Child Abuse” as they are known. They are a volunteer organisation giving of their own time and resources.

Having read both articles, I’d like to suggest that if we spent less time, effort and money protecting children against the imagined fears talked about by Ireland’s most cantankerous auld fella then maybe we’d be better able to protect them against the things they actually need protecting against which the volunteers of assist with.