There’s been an awful lot written about the Leveson report, and I’m sure you’ve already read a fair chunk of it, so I don’t intend to say that much. The pointlessness of the whole investigation was summed up for me by this tweet from “The bard:
The Bard (@TwitTwotBard):
“Can anybody name one press wrongdoing identified by Leveson that wasn’t covered by existing laws? A law to say the press must obey the law?”
As far as I’ve been able to determine, there’s not a thing the press are in trouble for that wasn’t already covered by existing laws. So yet again we’re being told we need more legislation and regulation to deal with a failure of enforcement of existing regulation. This is why our statue books keep getting larger and larger to no effect but to enrich lawyers and make it impossible for anyone to know what the law actually says.
As commented previously Mr Cameron is at least not keen on the idea of state regulation of the press, which is a good thing for as other people have observed like freedom of speech, or being pregnant you either have a free press or you don’t. A state appointed “independent” regulator is just state control at arms length, it is still however state control of the press. Judge Leveson’s call to regulate or as he puts it “civilize” the internet are at best laughable but of course may be used to justify state censorship of the Internet – something past evidence suggests most major parties are very keen on and you’re unlikely to see the mainstream press object (particularly once state regulated). To get an idea of where a state regulated press might quickly end up watch this video from a recent “green” conference (via Bishop Hill).
To save you a bit of effort here’s a still from that presentation, listing some of the measures they’d like put in place to regulate not just articles which disagree with “the scientific consensus” but also opinion pieces. They of course will be the ones to decide what is inaccurate or misleading.
If that doesn’t worry you then consider the same thing being put in place for every pressure group and vested interest. This is why the Leveson report shouldn’t be implemented and instead we should be calling for existing legislation to be applied and enforced (it might not work but hey lets try actyually applying existing law before making news ones).
There is of course an e-petiton to Oppose the implementation of the Leveson report which if you like having a free press I’d heartily recommend signing.*
* I know the government will likely ignore it but it’s always good to not give them excuses.



