Still giving away power to the EU

Do you remember that nice Mr Cameron seeming to promise not to give away more power to the EU without asking us first? Except of course it was only to block “new treaties” anything done under existing treaties is just fine. That this has had no effect on the tide of legislation coming from the EU and in fact wasn’t intended to have any effect was shown clearly when our new ConDem overlords adopted the EU arrest warrant. The EU is also setting up it’s own diplomatic service and can now supervise our national budget – and their latest acquisition of power a reform of EU financial services with three new governing bodies. So the much vaunted economic power house of our financial services sector will now be controlled by our glorious eurocrats, of course as ever they’ll just provided harmonised rules and leave it up to each nation to implement them – a technique which has worked so terribly well for us so far.

Our glorious leaders in Brussels so liked this idea that only 20 to 30 of them actually voted against it, the SNP are particularly pleased to have given away this chunk of self determination. I suspect they haven’t thought through how it will affect their own banks. The Tories meanwhile hope that this will be the high water mark of EU financial regulation and not just the start of it – they’ve obviously not been paying attention to how the EU works. So we’re now trusting financial regulation to an organisation that has never had it’s accounts approved and sets parts of it’s self up as a “special purpose vehicle” a tactic normally used for tax avoidance and Enron type scams, and when they’re done with that they’d like to take over copyright as well (see also yesterdays post for the knock on effect of that.

It really must be more than past time for us to escape this creeping authoritarian state that would have us ruled by unelected bureaucrats, though our glorious leaders have no interest in that and would tell us we don’t either. Douglas Carswell has a campaign to tell them otherwise before the only option left is to take to the streets or give in and accept our happy place as slaves to the EU state.

EU referendum

Paranoid triangulation

A couple of unrelated articles caught my eye a bit today and led me to wonder just how unrelated they really where, or rather to ponder the impact of both of them coming to pass.

Old Holborn highlighted the NUJ calling for state support for the vital democratic work of “proper” journalists. Rather than deal with their work not generally being worth much they like us all to be taxed and then given vouchers to give to “proper” news outlets. I figure this actually has a reasonable chance of getting implemented in some form, as it’s a neat way for the state to give journalists a bung and make them more dependent on the state. Exposed politicians expenses? That’s not the sort of thing a “proper” news outlet does, no more vouchers for you. The Journalists would be quite happy as the direct link between vouchers and payment probably wouldn’t last that long (due to the huge amount not being used) and once that link was broken they could sit back and publish state and corporate puff pieces whilst collecting their democracy dividend. The benefit for the state is obvious, even more control over a sometimes awkward press and of course more bureaucracy which would have to be paid for.

Meanwhile over in the US they’ve a new bill to give them the same sort of rights to block websites as our very own digital economy act does. Just like our version this allows “copyright holders” or at least large companies (as you can bet they won’t enforce any of it for content stolen from individuals by the MSM) to have domains pulled and ISPs forced to block any site which share “protected content”. I imagine wikileaks may somehow fall foul of that sooner or later. Of course as so much of the internet is still based in the US, the US aren’t stopping at just blocking sites nope, if you’re upsetting American copyright holders and have a top level domain (.com, .org etc.) then they’ll just freeze your domain. Even if what you’re doing isn’t illegal where you are.

So on the one hand you’ve got the mainstream media, asking for the state to support them out of taxes rather than compete against independent content/news providers, whilst at the same time the state is taking ever more draconian steps to remove anyone from the internet that upsets their MSM pals. Now putting on my best tin foil hat, and allowing for the fact that neither the state nor the MSM seem to be able to grasp the (currently) cheap cost of entry for on line publishing and the power of distributed systems, it does look rather like a concerted effort to stop the internet being an effective tool of the people. Once more they’re trying to shove the genie back into the bottle and regain the control of information that both the state and MSM have lost.

Spooks ask for more money and power

In a shock statement the head of MI5 would like more money, or at least not to have to make cuts, and if they could please continue to lock up anyone they thing is a wrong ‘un then that would be just dandy. In the meantime they’ll continue to work very hard blocking all sorts of threats they can’t tell us about, and the increasing number of attacks they expect to see from the bog trotters, Somali’s and other third world nations.

Full article here and remember just because someone isn’t breaking criminal law it’s no reason not to lock them up anyway.